Naw naw naw. What is sick is people discriminate against Kobe before he's proven guilty by asking one sided questions like this. Why don't you ask yourself what if Kobe was your father or your son? Her and his characters have something to do in this case, mark my words. If a wolf doesn't hunt for blood, then there's something wrong that worths a question.
Why is it that, if you ask questions that don't support the Kobe side, you believe in a conspiracy? I was listening to a discussion about the case and the Kobe supporters kept referring to the chief witness' frame of mind for dropping Kobe in the grease. No one questions Kobe's frame of mind even after that long Newsweek story about his conflicted past. I still say: Let the jury decide.
I agree Thumbs. How are you discriminating against Kobe, if you have some thoughts/questions about what may have happend etc., that do not help Kobe's case (in his favor). It's up to the Court. If he is guilty or not guilty. It's not up to us.
Why would she have multiple semen samples in her underwear? Don't people change their underwear anymore?
I wonder that too But hey, when the fellow is not getting it from his wife, he's got to find some place to dump the load.
Best damn post in here. I think Alicia Silverstone should be the lawyer, while viewing graphic and detailed pictures of Vida as the defendant would be quite tantalizing.
I hadn't heard about her underwear. What is definitely in evidence since the hearing is her blood on Kobe's Shirt. So whatever happened in that room she was bleeding from it.
I think the thing with another man's semen is basically a rumor being spread by Kobe's attorneys. I don't know, this is just my assumption. On another note, I think this Mackey attorney should be reprimanded for using the name of the presumed victim 6 times. There needs to be some kind of sanction for this kind of behavior.
Yes, but no mention of how much blood. Could've been a speck. No mention if it could've come from a broken scab. No mention if it was menstrual blood. No mention if the minute marks in the woman's area were injurious enough to bleed.
If they found it in her panties, it means that the first guy probaly didn't use a condom, she may be on the pill. And if she is a slut like they say, Kobe may of gotten a ride in HERPIE THE LOVE BUG.
I didn't say that Kobe was guilty or innocent. However, improbably the explanations are there are other ways her blood could have gotten on Kobe's shirt. It is in the realm of possibility. Are any of those probable? You'd have to decide for yourself. But the evidence about seman in her undies has not been introduced yet. The rumor is out there. The evidence of her blood on his shirt has been introduced and has left the realm of rumor.
What chu talkin bout? I'm a Rockets fan, amigo. Akeem all the way! Matt Bullard for THREEEE!!! Believe this, thumbs, Kobe's defense won't say that the blood on his shirt resulted from rape.
And that's comin straight 'n exclusively from the cristal ball, thumbz.... Kobe's defense will not outright admit that the blood came from the rape....now you may be thinking otherwise.... that they will indeed say the blood comes from the rape, but the ball says no to that scenario. and the ball don't never lie...never!! lol #@*$Y@&Y#$@U$#I()%#I)(R#(%#*lkdjfdsfow2304239 hahahahahaha
my question is...how did they get the panties from her? lmao. I mean did she say these was the ones i used? lol did she present them in a plastic bag to her attorney? LoL, If so...and she did have sex with another guy in them ( or 2 or 3) why would she give them that pair? lol.
This is gonna be just like OJ all over again....the accuser's gonna try on the evidence in front of the jury....and if the panties don't fit, you must not acquit...
Gimp evidently thinks Kobe's legal team will confess that the blood resulted from Kobe raping her. If I have a crystal ball, Gimp is on crystal meth.
