Giddy you're as deep as a thimble of water and you're dishonest as well. You attempt to dismiss my characterization of Rush as a racist by calling it unsubstantiated and then admit you knew of his statements the whole time. You've done nothing here but play little games and waste my time. I'm sure the other nonsensical game playing clowns around here are quite proud of your effort.
I said it was insubstantial not unsubstantiated. I didn't deny he said those things, but you and the writer of the piece take them out of context. Rush is an entertainer who uses much comedy to illustrate the issues. When are you going to get around to calling Chris Rock or Eddie Murphy racist brothers of Limbaugh? It would seem to me that you are fairly unfamiliar with the real Limbaugh. Over 15 years, I've listened to thousands upon thousands of hours of his show. Can you match that? You know of him mostly what his critics say. Is that a well-rounded view? Is that first-hand knowledge?
How are we to deal with your unsubstantiated major claims? Only thing to do is dismiss them completely. You make such broad claims and can, in no way, back them up. What a joke. First it was unsubstantiated, then it was he's not racist he's a comedian, after presented with the evidence it's now "out of context", plus you didn't say unsubstantiated you said insubstantial (whooops, can't spin that one can you?), and now you admit you've listened to thousands upon thousands of hours of a racist's talk show. I'm happy to say I don't support people who consistently spew racism but it does not surprise me that you do. I'm actually shocked at how dishonest and full of it you actually are. You're now in Trader_Tess land.
My mistake. Insubstantial was what I meant because of the relatively small evidence that your writer and you offered. That's what I remembered meaning. Obviously, I didn't go back and check my exact words. I stand corrected and now you can, perhaps, better understand my meaning. Sorry about the misake. On to something serious... Are you saying that context does not exist or is not a factor in taking meaning (especially in transcript)? <b>You must be omniscient!</b> I haven't listened to thousands upon thousands of hours of a racist's talk show.. I listen to Limaugh (more in the past than the present). That's more than you can say but still you consider yourself the expert. That's laughable. How can you still assert that he constantly "spews" racism? You only have a dozen lousy cracks he made. That's about 3 minutes of material there buddy in a 30-year career. BTW, you are dodging all of my questions and just ragging on with your same POV. Sack up and answer them. Do you deny Rush is an entertainer? Do you label other non-PC comesians as racist as well?
<b>timing</b>: What a relief? You were both unsubstantiated and then insubstantial. I'm getting lazy but I'm not losing my mind. You still avoid the questions I asked. Oh well.
