How do you know this? What about that cop who was repeating the plates back to the dispatcher? Way more likely he was the last to see her I guess we'll just disagree theres no chance in my mind that he is guilty Which Dassey the big brother or the one who "confessed". I hope you dont mean the younger one.... Requesting her multiple times come on dude....thats nothing. The cat thing is crazy but still that doesnt make him a killer.
what the juror said about jurors fearing for their safety was very interesting. i would love if the truth came out eventually. i'm totally addicted to the MAM reddit/theorizing. what would be amazing is if they can re-test the blood with new/improved methods that would without a doubt date it from '85. obviously there needs to be new evidence in order for a retrial. none of this has to do with brendan - it's absurd he's still in prison.
#4 has to be a joke....they even took a chunk of concrete and found 0 blood....these guys commited this bloody murder and are GOAT at cleaning it ALL up. Yea no #5. lmao guess all of clutchfans is guilty of murder #6 is pointless, doesnt mean anything #7 "Wednesday's filings statements from prisoners who served time with Avery" possibly prisoners looking for a reduced sentence, we've seen this before #8..reaching #9 ok? so what? he's dealt with her in the past, maybe he's had success with the vehicles he posts when she posted them? reaching again #10...sketchy, what about the brother and ex bf deleting voicemails and somehow figuring out her password? oh wait they were never looked as suspects only Avery. #11. "Of course, this could be explained by the fact that it was his sister’s car that Halbach was to photograph" lmao why even bother #13. So he was bleeding from a cut, yet only traces/smears of blood but no prints? not even a partial? come on... #14. "This bullet was found months later by a Manitowoc law enforcement officer after others missed it during repeated searches" lol you mean after it couldve been fired from averys gun, then plant the bullet some time later with halbachs DNA?
The point is that you or I can not sit here and say there is a 100percent chance he did it or a 0 percent chance he didn't do it.
Being a creeper which I would think women assume most men are anyway is one thing. Going from that to murderer who has disposed of almost all evidence of the victim on his entire property...come on. Let's say he didn't commit the crime on his property (near his trailer, garage, etc.). He did whatever out in the woods. Shot her out there. Eventually, he'll have to move her to the barrel that he burns her in. ZERO evidence of her presence anywhere? Oh, except for the suspect single bullet casing in the garage. Let's say somehow the casing was discharged from the gun and onto his clothes, and when he went to the garage to get an accelerant it fell there. But how is her blood on the casing itself? They don't typically have blood on them unless wherever they fall there is blood there from somewhere/one or eventually flows there from the victim. I guess when the casing got discharged from the weapon, fell into some crease on his clothes, blood splatter hit it? Or maybe while he was carrying her to the burnsite it rubbed some blood onto the casing? It's just too far a stretch for me, and add to the fact that these vital pieces of evidence were found DAYS/MONTHS after thorough searching, and found by Manitowoc personnel.
thats true, so why is he in jail? if you cant 100% say someone is guilty they should not be guilty then.
Young habits die hold(he seems to like the fire). He also pulled a gun on his own blood. I could lay a case suggesting he didn't value lfe and that 18 years of prison time probably didn't help his cause.
No. It was a response to you saying there was a 0 percent chance he did commit the murder and goes with me saying And from my earlier post.
You are ignorant if you think prior incidents don't reflect the person you are. There is a reason jobs have background checks. The fun thing is to believe he got framed(and I think he did to an extent), but there is more things saying he did it than not. So my manitowoc" opinion suggest he murdered her.
well i can say 0% because you cant half kill someone you either did it or didnt. With the evidence provided i can say he didnt and regarding your earlier post, that just doesnt make sense to me. If you think he did it then he shouldve been convicted.
So they reflect he killed a cat? and that makes him a killer some 20 years later? He just decided **** it remember that cat i killed ima do it to a person now. yea ignorant
There's a difference between he murdered her and he's guilty. I think the cops jacked the case up more than it needed. They will end up being his way out if they retrial it.
I should of reworded my post. I think there is a POSSIBILITY that he committed the murder and my THEORY was that he did murder her but not how the evidence portrayed. That is based off me reading reddit, etc and watching the documentary. My understanding is that the jury has to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that he did commit the murder. Even though I think there is a possibility he did murder her and since I have doubts on whether or not he did it, would put me in the "he shouldn't have been convicted" side.
