The Significance of the Najaf Bomb & Killing of the Ayatollah

Hayes, look since Sadam was genocidal that was enough to start the war for you. You have an extreme position, but you are certainly entitled to it.

The sanctions are estimated to have killed 500,000 Iraqis. How many are required for a genocide? Damn right I was against the sanctions , like many people outside realtively conservative US circles.

For you the existence of wmd is atually irrelevant as long as Sadam would continue to try to get them eventually. Sufficient for you to start war. Again extreme,. Blair and Bush had to sell their publics that Iraq was a more or less immediate threat to gain public support.

Perhaps you advocate Bush did a good thing to lie or exagerate or cook the evidence about wmd as the American people are too stupid to acept your position. We had a poster Deuce Ring who praised Bush for this.

You advoate invading any country that has a genocidal leader where we can essentially do it without too many casualities. How many is too much for you? Again an extreme position.

I'm against so called nuclear non-proliferation of the right wing type that you espouse. This involves basically trying to keep wmd for ourselves and our friends. You advoate starting wars with any country that is small enough to have a war with that is trying to get wmd. Please tell us how many Amerian lives other than your own, which you don't volunteer, would be aceptable for you. You do say PRC is too big.

Of course under your policy we have slips up now and then. Pakistan,India and Israel to name a few of the more recent ones.

Your type of nuclear non-proliferation is failing and is a fools errand. In fact as we see with Iran and N. Korea it just enourages countries to rush to have nukes to keep from being invaded by the incredibly militaristic America that you support.