You have issues, boss. Let it go. I was with you on Mallett. Hoyer is proving to be a capable starter until we draft a guy early and develop him. Hoyer will be around next season and will even start even on week 1 is my guess. Your insecurities are really showing in this type of post.
I can already see it. Bobby will come in after the Cincy game huffing and puffing about how he is right about Hoyer.
Probably. I don't see Hoyer having a great game against Cincy. He kind of is what he is at this point, though. If he plays well against Cincy, I'd be fine with him starting for up to a year while a rookie gets acclimated.
It's going to be several games in a row so there won't be a need to "huff and puff", much like the Jones situation, I think the majority of the board will realize that I'm right and the minority that are upset by that will be silenced due to performance.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/EliasSports">@EliasSports</a> has added a quarterback hit to <a href="https://twitter.com/HoustonTexans">@HoustonTexans</a> DE <a href="https://twitter.com/JJWatt">@JJWatt</a>'s stat line from Sunday vs TEN to bring his total to a career-high 10</p>— Texans PR (@TexansPR) <a href="https://twitter.com/TexansPR/status/661959536551600129">November 4, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Well you might as well stick to your wrong opinion. At this point you cant embarrassed yourself any further
What exactly would you be right about? Hoyer has already proven to be better than Mallett. That's the end of the discussion right there. Unless Hoyer closes out the season with 15 INT and 0 TDs, you've lost your argument.
Exactly. He said that Mallett was better (so did I). We were wrong. Everything else is a moot point. He also said that Hoyoer gave us no shot at winning and the season was a lost cause. If Mallett was never in the picture, our outlook through 8 games would be MUCH better.
