This is one of the fundamental problems I have with your whole thing about Islam. You act like all this violence, stoning, and mistreatment of women came about when Islam did and so associate it with Muslims. But the reality is all of those things were rampant prior to Islam. Backwardness needs to be rooted out, you will never do that by attacking the religion though. A religion isn't what created the backwardness. It is the product of it.
This is completely wrong. The ideology might be the product of backwardness initially, but it also creates and perpetuates backwardness, especially if it demands to be all-encompassing and infallible and threatens those who ask critical questions or use satire or humor for dissent. Why do you say that you cannot "attack a religion"? Why not? If an ideology prescribes stoning of homosexuals and apostates and discrimination of women and people of other beliefs, then this is pure backwardness. And it should be called out. Such backward beliefs should not be tolerated just because they disguise themselves as religion. They must be spoken out against because if you give them room to grow, you allow freedoms to be taken away that we fought long and hard for in Western societies.
You can attack all you like, I am only saying it's not productive. Telling a bunch of fundamentalist fanatics that their views are crazy isn't going to change their views, it's just going to inflame them further. You can do it, but all accomplishing absolutely nothing. It's like telling someone who believes in conspiracy theories that they are wrong. It doesn't work. What you do doesn't make people less supportive of radicals. All you do is come across as really obsessed.
Telling a bunch of fundamentalist fanatics something is one thing. Their views will most likely not change. But telling those who are somewhere in between the fundamentalist fanatics and a morally acceptable position - namely those majorities of Muslims in the Pew polls who voted in favor of death penalty for apostasy, in favor of lesser rights for women, in favor of criminal sanctions against homosexuals - that is not without hope - or so I hope. Unless you say that these hundreds of millions of Muslims are fundamentalist fanatics whose views can never be changed. Or unless you say that the Muslims I am talking to on this board are solely fundamentalist fanatics. Your stance is "you can't change it, so why even say anything". That is the passive stance that allowed tyranny to take hold in the past, like with the Nazis. My stance is to speak out against intolerance and religious fanatism.
Criticism of religion from a third party will hardly ever work on the religious. Christians cry persecution when atheists or secularists criticize Christianity and the same with Islam. No one likes their faith being criticized. There is no such thing as constructive criticism amongst the religious crowd when it comes to religion especially from an outsider. My rhetoric on Islam and yours isn't going to solve anything. It all amounts to a giant circle jerk. This popped up on my facebook news feed. https://www.facebook.com/pamelagell...439?comment_id=10153780066252439¬if_t=like Since I am a veteran, a large share of my facebook friends are veterans also and many of them have a distaste for Islam and some for Muslims as a whole. I see these stories being shared all the time on my news feed. Just read the comment section. It's a circle jerk of 'critics' of Islam. This is what a circle jerk of 'criticism' of Islam looks like. Here are some various quotes: "islam is the religion of murder, rape, pedophilia, and lies. Cannot believe a single word coming from 90% or more of muslims." "Same way, 1 bullet to the head of a muslim, makes him a NON-MUSLIM because then he is ca DEAD muslim!!!" "Wild and brutal Muslim savages with no respect for women and someone else's life. Muslims are worst than wild animals; even the Neanderthals were even more caring and civilized than these Islamic brainless brutes. Nevertheless, Islam is the savage ideology they want to impose by force all over the world." "Mohammed and his band of ****ing sub human followers are nothing but paedophiles and that comic rag the quran is something I would only wipe my ass with,muslim scum should be and will eventually be exterminated,the rest of the world has had enough of these scummy bastards." "That is just another reason to not trust muslims" "Turn the Middle East to glass and be done with the dark age cult!!" " A radical Islam will kill you, a moderate will hold his coat while he does it." I can do this for weeks. When a significant portion of conservatives are willing to make these statements, it makes sense that there might be some pushback from the left. I'm well embedded into conservative culture in the U.S. A large majority of infantry Marines are highly right wing. I hear this type of rhetoric all the time. ATW, you can't brush it off as some anonymous internet posters. There is a significant portion of American conservatives who are willing to state genocidal statements. As intelligent as individuals such as Bill Maher, Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins are, I find it quite puzzling why they can't figure out why many liberals find a need to 'defend' Islam. In actuality, 90% of the time liberals are defending Muslims, not Islam itself anyways. I hope you could understand why sometimes I welcome these 'regressive' leftists as they are the ones who won't judge someone like my mother just because she is Muslim.
fchowd0311, every single one of these quotes you posted is disturbing, and the people who posted them are idiots. I hope you see that I don't think like that. But it needs to be allowed to criticize an ideology - that is very different from making disgusting statements like the ones you quoted.
Trust me, I know you don't think that way. But I hope you understand why some of these 'regressive leftists' might exist. When they hear this bat**** insane rhetoric, they are worried. The intentions are well meaning because they are thinking of individuals just like my mother.
but that's what you inflame. Those are the people who agree with you. That's what I mean by you're not criticizing, you demonize. My approach is to find productive solutions. Attacking Islam is your right, but it is anti-productive because you just put people on the defensive. I have plenty of issues with that part of the world, but going around and saying "Islam = violence" isn't going to make a Muslim go, "wow, I never realized that". What it will do is get them to think that Westerns hate Islam and Muslims because they are Christians, and that's why the radicals exist. You are also helping people thing that Islam is evil on the western side by spreading this stuff. So you are being doubly unproductive. If you want to change thing, your aim should be figuring out how do we fundamentally change that region so there's less poverty and ignorance, and the indoctrination of radicalism ends. Why not address the idea around why so many Muslims are not radicals and how they ended up not being violent. We have to stand with peaceful Muslims, not isolate them and put them on the defensive by attacking Islam itself.
I'll also point out that we don't need to go to facebook to find comments like that. Here's a recent post on Clutchfans saying much the same thing. And you are on that thread ATW, and you don't call out this user as an idiot, while you do call out a different user. If you really want to be seen as separate from the xenophobes and bigots that the left is trying to combat, then instead of just calling out the left when their defense of Islam starts resembling the old Stalin apologists, you also have to call out those making these bigoted, ignorant and disgusting comments against Muslims which even you see as disturbing and idiotic. For example, while I, as a radical leftists and supporter of anti-fascist direct action, would join in your criticisms of repressive, authoritarian, reprehensible Islamic groups, would you join in my criticisms of the xenophobic, bigoted and nationalistic behavior from groups like Pegida in Germany or Republicans like Trump and Carson here in the U.S.?
No, they do not agree with me, and I do not agree with them, and I do not inflame anything. These people have nothing in common with me. No, it isn't - your approach is being totally unable to distinguish between someone criticizing an ideology and someone attacking people. I criticize the ideology of political Islam and its intolerant elements, specifically, e.g., death penalty for apostasy, for homosexuality, discrimination of women and of people of other beliefs. I also criticize those who hold these beliefs. Unfortunately, there are many. I do not attack people who follow Islam for spiritual reasons and/or who were born into being Muslims, just for being Muslim. The people fchowd0311 quoted are actually more like you: They do not comprehend the distinction between an ideology and the people. I do. You don't. They don't. No, you are wrong. The radicals don't exist because of that. The radicals exist because they were indoctrinated with their ideology. They don't exist because of me or because I would have "put them on the defensive". That's complete nonsense. I also never said "Islam = violence". I specifically pointed out examples of unacceptable intolerance within the ideology of political Islam. Do you disagree with me that these elements of political Islam are unacceptable? Or are you saying that one cannot criticize because "it puts people on the defensive". So in Nazi times, you would not have criticized the Nazis for being racist "because it puts them on the defensive"? If you think that pretending these issues don't exist helps anyone in any way, you are wrong. Only awareness will eventually effect change. You are wrong. The best way to stand with peaceful Muslims and to work with them is to identify the line between them and those who hold intolerant beliefs. If they do not hold these intolerant beliefs (and act on them), I stand with them. I totally respect their freedom to believe in whatever they want, as long as it does not include intolerant beliefs which end up leading to a restriction of others' freedoms. But if they do hold these intolerant beliefs (e.g. discrimination of women, of people of other beliefs, of homosexuals; looking down on/discriminating against "non-believers"; inability to accept the freedom of humor/satire; believing in sanctions for "apostasy"), then no, I do not stand with them. It is not enough that they are not cutting heads off and thereby they could be considered "peaceful". I will also not put up with intolerant beliefs or actions. By drawing the line in the sand where these intolerant beliefs start, I stand with those Muslims who stand on the same side of the line as I do. These are our Western values. I am not isolating anyone. I am giving everyone the opportunity to agree with these Western values. But if someone believes in these things, then no, they do not stand with me. HoneyBear is a special case, he's obviously posting for effect. Before I would have to call him out, many of you guys would have to call out (and report) people like Exiled first. Yes, I would join you for Pegida, and yes for some statements by Trump, but I am not familiar enough with all of what's going on in the USA to know much about Carson or everything about Trump.
Oh, HoneyBear is just trolling? I didn't realize that. Guess I got got on that one. But, all I want is less flag waving (not to say you are guilty of this, I'm just speaking generally) and more nuanced analysis. The Carlin - Harris debate I linked to for example was amazing -- and though I disagree with Harris's position and side much more with Carlin, the level of insight and civility both gave was what we need more of. Understandable on you not knowing about Trump and Carson since you are German (I don't know nearly as much about Pegida as you do, I am sure). But I would just like reasonable people to see beyond ideological classifications of left and right, and be able to jointly analyze and criticize issues in the Islamic world without fueling the hatred espoused by groups like Pegida or the racist and nationalistic elements of the Republican party in the western world. Perhaps then we'd stop supporting dictators, Islamists and authoritarians as part of our foreign policy in the middle east, and turn our support instead to groups that may be more to the left than our government would like, but which are supporting values of democracy, equality, tolerance and secularism (like the PYD in Kurdish Syria today or like Mossadegh in the past, whose overthrow by the CIA precipitated the rise of Islamists in Iran and highly exacerbated issues in the region).
You can believe what you will, but the net result is you inflame and demonize. The people that think that way love you on here. They are your biggest supporters. You may not have anything in common with them in your mind, but you are their champion. THink about that. Let's not be disingenuous. You go far beyond what you claim here. It's laughable that you say you only criticize for these things. You have said Islam is a religion of hate and that Islam is inherently violent. You are not criticizing intolerance of Islam, you are declaring Islam to be incapable of being tolerant. I know the difference between legit criticism and over-the-top attacks. You have a history of attacking, not just Islam but many posters on this board, including myself. Your behavior has been disturbing and obsessive. Again, that is not what you are doing. You inflame. There is a big difference between inflaming and criticizing. At times you criticize. But others you demonize. No problem with criticism. Again see above. The whole world is already aware of these issues. We don't need you to tell us what goes on there. Everyone here ALREADY KNOWS. Yes, you stand with a people by attacking them. That makes perfect sense. It's like saying let's stand with Americans by saying all Americans are evil capitalists and stupid. Hmmm, very supportive of those Americans who want to make change happen! Drawing a line isnt what you do. You cross the line and spit on the other side.
fchowd0311, since you were citing ignorant comments on your Facebook news feed. Here is a video Bill Gates posted today, of a short conversation with Malala (the girl that was shot by the Taliban). <div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script><div class="fb-post" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/BillGates/videos/10153167502691961/" data-width="500"><div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore"><blockquote cite="https://www.facebook.com/BillGates/videos/10153167502691961/"><p>I recently got to talk to Malala Yousafzai about her life, and the new movie about her.Here’s a short video of our chat: http://b-gat.es/1LoyKj5</p>Posted by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/BillGates">Bill Gates</a> on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/BillGates/videos/10153167502691961/">Thursday, October 8, 2015</a></blockquote></div></div> If you read the comments from some of the guys there (from Pakistan, I guess), blaming the victim...these are horrible as well.