Congrats, you took two different games and two different scenarios. I am sure I could look up a game where Yao had 10points and Bradley had 18 points and Bradley would be the better scorer. That would be pretty funny too. The reality is that Yao hasnt stepped up to be the go to guy. He isnt demanding the ball and he isnt taking charge. And until then it would be better for this team for Yao to differ to Tmac as the main go to guy. Ultimately though we want Yao to be the main guy. But until he can put forth the effort it doesnt make sense for us to force feed Yao the ball to the point where Tmac gets less shots.
I am sure I could look up a game where Yao had 10points and Bradley had 18 points and Bradley would be the better scorer. That would be pretty funny too. The reality is that Yao hasnt stepped up to be the go to guy. He isnt demanding the ball and he isnt taking charge. And until then it would be better for this team for Yao to differ to Tmac as the main go to guy. Ultimately though we want Yao to be the main guy. But until he can put forth the effort it doesnt make sense for us to force feed Yao the ball to the point where Tmac gets less shots. Tmac wasn't score 48 points in many game in his 7 years career, don't even bother to mention his miserible 1/11 shooting game. The reality is that Yao hasn't get the ball when he had the position, when he double team pitch out for teammate, those guys can't even hit wide open shot. nobody can beat double team or trible team all night long, if the teams dare to single cover him, Yao can eat him alively, that's really story.
I agree...but Yao's shooting % will be higher in the long run, and therefore his efficiency...so I think that normally, Yao's shot will be the higher % shot. But it's not either/or...it's about how to get the best out of both, I think we agree about that .
