no one in this years batch stands up to the level of the last couple. not in my mind anyway. i'm gonna go with Amy as my pick. http://www.wwe.com/superstars/divas/2006divasearch/
Are they still wasting their time with this? I was under the impression the first one was a disaster. The crowd hated it. Even bringing back The Rock to liven things up backfired. And to add insult to injury, the winner lasted about a year with the company. What pisses me off about the WWF(among many other things) is that they used to have a really good women's division. But McMahon killed it because he wanted women on there strictly for T&A, not realizing that for a good while he already had that in addition to quality matches.
From what I've read, the Diva Search segments actually pull in strong television ratings, despite the crowd reactions. Go figure. The first winner, Christy Hemme, wasn't so bad and actually looked like she enjoyed the job. It boggles my mind why they cut her and kept the dull generic winner from last year. This has basically become Vince's Playboy search since the girls everyone wants to see (Trish, Stacy, Lita) aren't willing to pose.
UHHHHH ARE YOU SERIOUS!? I don't know anything about search or anything, but I clicked the link just to get a quick glance at the girls. Jennifer Walcott is one of the hottest women anywhere, I do believe. I saw her back when she first did Playboy, and she's not someone you'd forget about. Just go Google image search her, and tell me she doesn't "stand up to the level of the past."
I just found this kind of funny after reading posts from Diaw and rockets-#1: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/divas/2006divasearch/walcottdropsout Personally, I don't really care that much about the Diva Search. I guess they're nice to look at, but the WWE already has plenty of women that fit into that category. I guess it is better than watching more See No Evil promos.
Well the World Wildlife Federation could use some more T&A. I mean I can only look at Pandas and Komodo Dragons for so long.
Are FAKE BOOBS a requirement for this "tournament"??? <crybaby>Man, whatever happened to al-natural babes... </crybaby> I don't have to say this, but definitely NO BRAINS: DUMB. The question was "non-physical", you idiot.
I think one of them said that she has real boobs. I can't remember if she is one of the final 8 or not though. edit: Yeah, she's actually the same person you quoted. http://www.wwe.com/superstars/divas/2006divasearch/rebeccadipietro/divasearchq
If Jennifer Walcott is out, so is my interest. I was hoping she'd win and then get a brand new Playboy cover and photoshoot because I'm tired of all her old stuff. I need new inspiration.
There are almost no women in the WWF with real breasts. Stacy Keibler is one, but why would she want giant fake boobs distracting our attention from those legs? Hell, even Stephanie McMahon got implants. I think Stacy and Linda McMahon are the only natural ones left. I'm not sure about Lillian Garcia, the ring announcer.
