They should really have a 'Analyst' Challenge like Dream Job. Instead of having Dee Brown, they should have real NBA analyst vs NBA Analyst. Who would win this?
In terms of analyzing, Greg Anthony is the best guy in terms of being in terms of analyzing in terms of being the best in terms of analyzing.
In terms of analyzing basketball and what teams are doing and not doing, Kenny Smith is the best. Anthony is an also ran. He's good but Kenny is much better.
who's voting for Magic? I mean, his analysis is 'dats right charlz' or 'hahahaha' or 'back when i played da celtics'
I voted for Greg Anthony. Kenny Smith is good , but sometimes really confusing- fails to get his point across. Fro Example- the reference to "eating soup with a fork"-talking about veterans desire to win......
Kenny Smith loses points for saying that the Rockets should have kept Tyron Lue. Said that he gave them that much needed, 'pushing the ball up the court' style. Total BS. My vote goes to Walton, as annoying as he may be, he seem to know what he's talking about.
I was between Smith and Smith but I voted for Stephen. Stephen has always been an intense truthful jerk, I like that. Charles Barkley is an egotistical joke of an announcer.
I give Charles credit for saying that Sam Mitchell, in the middle of the night, should go to Rafer Alston's room and beat the crap out of him.
I know he is more of a color guy, but Hubie Brown is, IMO, hands down the best at "knowing whats going on".
Of that group it isnt even close, it's Greg Anthony. The rest of the group is all about "opinion" instead of analysis. I guess Kenny would be second on the list. Hubie Brown is FAR and away the leader of analysists though. He may be "dry" but the information is good. Give my a dry informative analysist over an ignorant loud mouth anyday!
Talk about bottom of the barrel. I had to read the list twice before deciding Kenny was the lesser of the evils. I have a write in vote for David Aldridge.
