The last thing I need is to read another D&D pissing match -- and one where I have to click the little View Post links on every relevant post.
Oh! Believe me! Batman has pissed all over TJ. Has for several threads now. TJ is just foaming at the mouth these days! It's better than TV!
I'm not frustrated at all, Jorge. I haven't had this much fun on the BBS in years. And I'm not accusing the mods of anything. Just guessing at the mystery of 22 people agreeing with you and zero saying so. Why do you think that is? You're right it's classic though.
its actually pretty close? thats the whole point.. and you've been shouting everywhere that you totally owned bj.. loser.. well its pretty simple the name of the thread is who owned who the poll question is who got owned are you getting confused? same as in that thread you' got confused that the whole issue is all about the warrrant/court order.. and terrorists are not actually handed warrants as you thought.. conquistaboar, my advice to you is to stay away from eating too much steak its not too late
Oh my. You do know that the D&D is probably 5-1 liberal, right? Given that this poll is pretty close, you've got a lot of liberals voting that Batman got owned. What does that tell you? OWNED
are you really proud for losing? i know keeping it close is already a suprising achievement considering how much non sense you spewed these past few days..
Awesome. Where are they? To date, zero people have backed up any of your weird positions in that thread. That makes zero people who thought the government had to serve the warrants to the suspects (you still haven't explained that particular gem), that the NSA's word was good enough for them, that the warrants would compromise secrecy, that the warrants would compromise expediency, that the warrants were too distracting to get, that the warrants were too easy to get, that I flip flopped on anything or that the poll question that didn't include mention of warrants included the mention of warrants. I think it'd be great to get someone else on record defending any of those hilariously indefensible statements. 23 people and counting and still nobody will stand up and say something? Come on, "liberals." Don't be shy. I can take it.
Yes, but calling somebody a "boar" isn't really an insult. It just doesn't make much sense. Did you mean to say the word "bore"?
So you are saying the mods are manipulating the results? A lot of people think you lost. Including many liberals. Doesn't surprise me, given how your argument changed no less than 3 times after you got news you didn't like.
Beejster - the conservatives probably fear the inevitable liberal pile-on technique if they step up and support TJ. It's quite telling that so many are voting for him, however, especially given the strong liberal lean to this board. There's a lot of votes against you. Is "mod manipulation" your only defense?
Where is the "none of the above" option? Everyone loses. TJ loses because he is a loser BJ loses because he "argues" with TJ The bbs loses because they both wash, sinse, and repeat The USA loses because of the children that read their exchanges The world loses because of the international presence China loses because TJ makes Yao Ming sad...which costs China money The War on Terror loses because these threads make me go out and kill our brave soldiers Finally, everyone mentioned above loses doubly because I posted this inanity
That's great, Baiter. And I'd love to never do it again. Unfortunately that kind of requires not posting here. I started a thread, Jorge came in to wreck it with a bogus poll and I said how the poll was bogus. And that was the beginning of the end. Jorge is a class A troll. He comes into a thread, posts nonsense, claims victory and demands a response. Yes, it's a mistake to respond, but when you start a thread and it's derailed with misinformation you just feel compelled to correct the record. When that correction is met with more misinformation, much of which is just hilariously wrong, it gets to be like crack. On that point, yeah, I concede. Anyone making the mistake of responding to Jorge's stuff is "owned" in a way I guess. Normally, after a few volleys, I call him an idiot and stop wasting time. But that thread was just so chock full of classics I couldn't help myself. By the way, I've still yet to hear from a single poster (including his own brother, LOL) that defends even one of his arguments. Of course, I'm not blind to the fact that where trolling's concerned the arguments don't matter at all.
Nope. My "defense" is in the thread. Jorge has never looked quite so pathetic and he's looked mighty pathetic. "Mod manipulation" is only one possible answer. I'd love it if there was a way to turn this into a public poll. Don't you find it a little weird that not one single poster (out of 27, apparently) has defended even one of Jorge's weak ass arguments? Your argument that the pro-Jorge crowd is too scaredy cat on account of all the liberals falls a little flat when the poll's this close. The water's fine, guys. Come tell me where I was wrong. Here's a hint: you can't.
