1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Steve vs Aaron Brooks

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by tinman, Nov 2, 2007.

Tags:
?

Who should get more time?

  1. Steve

    151 vote(s)
    38.3%
  2. Aaron

    193 vote(s)
    49.0%
  3. Both equal playing

    22 vote(s)
    5.6%
  4. Neither, let them ride the pine

    28 vote(s)
    7.1%
  1. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    I'm wondering who should get more PT?
    The veteran PG and former franchise player, or the quick new youngster we just drafted.
     
  2. orbb

    orbb Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,045
    Likes Received:
    16
    let it go. please.
     
  3. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    Can't let what go? none of these dudes have played yet.
    its not VSPAN.
     
  4. floorten

    floorten Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    No doubt. Steve
     
  5. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    there was situation like this back in the day.
    it was Scotty Brooks vs Sam Cassell.

    The veteran Scotty who was great at finishing games and the rookie with potential.

    A little different now since we have 4 point guards.
     
  6. metalshred

    metalshred Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    130
    I'll take stevie.

    Personally, i think it's a matter of whether steve wants to play or not rather than is he going to play.
     
  7. Rover16

    Rover16 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    4
    Brooks easily. Not even close!
     
  8. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    Kenny Smith dammit!







    afterall this IS a tinman thread
     
  9. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    Kenny was the starter and it was sealed in cement for 6 great seasons.
    The battle was for #2.

    Here we have a battle for #3 (unless Rafer really blows it as the starter)
     
  10. Seven

    Seven Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,251
    Likes Received:
    28
    Why isn't Brooks in the D-league yet. I vote Brooks if you count D-League time, but both equal playing time if it doesn't because Zero=Zero! :)
     
  11. blender

    blender Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    6
    First the debate was Francis vs. Rafer or James for Starting/Backup PG.

    Then, it was Francis vs. Head for third-string minutes.

    And now it's Francis vs. the rookie? Man, you guys are too cruel.
     
  12. madmonkey37

    madmonkey37 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    52
    Thats a good question, unless brooks is ahead of Stevie on the depth chart.
     
  13. Barkley

    Barkley Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,120
    Likes Received:
    0
    Strange thread cause the answer is easy. Steve is a lot better
     
  14. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    If it's just garbage time, Brooks. If there's an injury to a backcourt player and we need someone to fill in, then Steve,
     
  15. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,148
    Likes Received:
    2,817
    Neither please. Either one getting significant PT means more injury problems have hit the ROX. Hopefully Brooks can take the opportunity of practicing with and being around the team to develop (unlike V-SPAN, who used it to b****) and can be a rotation player in a year or two. Steve can go ahead and get traded or retire please.
     
  16. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    Luther got PT. Francis and Brooks have not.

    anyone surprised? this happens every year. Stromile, DA, Kirk, Vspan, Boki ...
     
  17. zong

    zong Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought Steve was and is overweighted, if he is the shape, he should be better than Brooks.
     
  18. poprocks

    poprocks Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Didn't Brooks just about miss every single shot he put up in preseason? Sorry but it's the bench for AB's for the season. Rookie!
     
  19. tinman

    tinman 999999999
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 1999
    Messages:
    104,274
    Likes Received:
    47,160
    52 minutes, 7 assists, 3 turnovers.
     
  20. shipwreck

    shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,126
    Likes Received:
    135
    The question is oversimplifying, and you all are overthinking.

    If it is purely Steve or purely Brooks, SF3 is the easy proven choice and the guy you take out of the two, simply because of what he has done at the NBA level. Brooks will be the better choice eventually, but as of now is PROBABLY too inexperienced to run a team right now.

    Overthinking, because this is for 3rd chair PG, and because I am just sick of seeing SF3 waste away. He doesn't appear interested in trying to impress RA, not to mention getting in shape. I am probably naive to think that I know what Steve is thinking, but despite his all star years (namely with our franchise) he is fighting a late first round pick (albeit a very athletic, promising one) for third fiddle.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now