Curry is the type of player you can build a franchise around. We unfortunately dont have 1 player like that right now.
Lol you say Curry is the next Steve Nash and then you say right after that you want to trade him for Scola and Hill. I'm sure Scola and Hill is not worth the "next Steve Nash."
They will not trade Curry without receiving a superstar in return. Ellis on the other hand, couldbe more attainable.
Ok but you still dont give a team Scola, Martin, Hill and whatever for a Curry. I wouldnt and am sure Morey wouldnt either.
agreed...lowry keeps his starting job and curry bring the spark off the bench..would love to trade brooks for him..but wont happen..
I dont know if youre trying to be funny or make a point Well u failed at both .. That was immature and superficial .. Melo already said she will have no major part in his desicion of where he will end up
Warriors would be crazy to trade Curry. He is probably the only franchise player for the Warriors. Monta Ellis is good but he's not that good. I would trade any combination of our players for Curry. He is that good.
I've read a few articles about the Warriors desire to acquire someone else to pair with Ellis. If they were looking at someone like Iggy, we could easily get involved as a third team. They may not want Curry just because they have holiday, but would want a first round pick from gs. We could be in there to make the salaries work and snatch Curry. At worse maybe we could get Biedrins, possibly both. We throw GS Lowry and then phili some expiring contracts, I think everyone gets what they want.
Just to throw in I played with the trade machine, I suck with it but this gives philly lots of expirings plus a good cheap pf, we drop some of our older players get Curry and a decent center. GS Gets Iggy and a good PG to replace curry in lowry. Throw in some draft picks. http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=5ron6bg
