1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Spurs-Lakers

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by Molotov Cocktail, Apr 29, 2004.

  1. LakerMania

    LakerMania Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    2
    [​IMG]
     
  2. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458
    Well, if sans MJ counts, the the Spurs have what, half a title?
     
  3. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,055
    Likes Received:
    15,229
    I am so so disappointed in the Spurs. They were the primary bulwark against the Lakers winning the championship. I couldn't stand it if the Lakers won another. Besides, even if Minn or Sac or whoever somehow actually beat the Lakers, it still wouldn't be as disgraceful as falling in the second round. The Lakers looked bad against the Rockets, even in losing only 1 game. Aren't the Spurs supposed to be good? I don't even have the heart to read game recaps anymore.
     
  4. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
    Freakin' Spurs...The under achieved and now the Fakers are in...I really don't like the Fakers, but you have to give them credit for taking it to them...I think it'll be the Queens vs. the Fakers...Fakers win and play Detroit...
     
  5. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    And Shaq is about to be up 4-2 on Hakeem - yay!

    Great post JV. I feel the exact same way.
     
  6. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    It's over. Wolves will get crushed. Shaq will have a field day. If they don't make it, the Kings will - Webber's rusty. Is Bobby Jackson even playing? I haven't watched any of that series.

    All those rooting against the Spurs - hope you like Karl Malone. Here comes his ring. Here comes another one for KOwannaBElikemike as well.
     
  7. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Like I said the Kings and Wolves are just as good or better than the Spurs, and the Spurs would had a great chance to advance save the miracle Fisher shot. Both teams have plenty of guys to throw at Shaq--EJ, Kandi (he will be more important next series where we won't be expected to cover big men who can shoot), BM (irritating guy for Shaq), Vlade (another irritating guy for Shaq)--and with Sac starting to play some team defense they can be very tough.

    One major difference between the Spurs and Wolves and Kings--both the latter have much more versital offenses and more good offensive options, starting with pick and role's with Sam or Bibby using Shaq's cover that will give the Lakers fits (they are much more consistent on the perimeter than Parker). The Wolves have also played D like the Spurs all year, and Sac is finally showing flashes of their defensive capability. The story from the Spurs-Laker's series was the atrocious shooting by the Spurs, and they still had a decent chance. The Wolves and Kings have a lot more exploitable offensive options and flexibility.
     
  8. BiGGieStuFF

    BiGGieStuFF Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,396
    Likes Received:
    365
    how come no one thinks the duncan shot before the fisher shot was a miracle as well? My thoughts. Spurs got lucky on duncan's miracle shot. :eek: Either way it was a great series. Sad to see someone lose. :(
     
  9. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    Sure Duncan's two shots were lucky as well. But the point is the games turned on the flip of the coin, and easily could have gone to game 7.

    Same point as versus Sac 2 years ago. That ball doesn't bounce to Horry in game 4, or Chrisite or Hedo or Peja make 1 extra jumper late in game 7, Shaq has one less title.

    There have been a lot bigger sports upsets than will be the case if the Lakers lose to the Wolves or Kings, that is one of my points. My 2nd point is I believe either of those teams create more problems to the Lakers than the less flexible, younger, Spurs team.

    Those who don't think either the Wolves or Kings have a shot I don't think have been watching the game close enough the last 3 or so years. I could be wrong, but I really doubt the Lakers get a cake walk like many are saying--2 of the lakers recent 3 titles easily could have gone to other teams with a couple fo different bounces (Blazers, Kings). We talk like it is destiny, just like the Rockets titles, but the truth is those were fragile victories that could have turned out differently with just a little extra bad luck.
     
  10. KeepKenny

    KeepKenny Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    14
    Most of the time a lucky-ass shot with under a second left to play will win you the game. So when you do hit it, it's much more heartbreaking if you lose.
     
  11. super_mario

    super_mario Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    1
    I worry about the Wolves' chances against the Lakers. Specifically, Shaq won't have to play any defense against EJ and Kandi. At least he had to honor Rasho's shot in the Spurs series.
     
  12. ZRB

    ZRB Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    6,818
    Likes Received:
    4

    Once he went up 3-2 it was too late to care about that.

    Anyway, Duncan and Hakeem are still tied.
     
  13. BiGGieStuFF

    BiGGieStuFF Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    5,396
    Likes Received:
    365
    I think Wolves make up for this on the defensive end where they have the best zone of any team and might be able to neutralize shaq in the paint. Lakers shooters are decent but wont' be able to hit enough shots against the zone to break it. Plus I think garnett's speed and athleticism poses more defensive problems for malone than duncan does. Spurs had the best chance but definitely I wouldn't count either the kings or the wolves out against the lakers. Garnett and cassell playing screen/roll on lakers could cause more problems than parker/duncan or bibby/divac/miller/webber
     
  14. Dave2000

    Dave2000 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    11,091
    Likes Received:
    813
    They are showing Game 5 on ESPN Classic right now in which they showed it once already, for the curious.
     

Share This Page