And both of those two "countless" instances came after I had already been accused of "countless" instances of same (at which point, "countless" equalled zero). In other words, FranchiseBlade is correct: I was making fun of basso, not of any DS child. And yet, according to basso, even though I have a special needs brother, I have "made [my] disdain for special needs children clear." In other words, basso=lying ass.
It seems the poker was getting prodded. A bi-partisan game of tummy sticks... hardly the morals of a true conservative.
interesting how you use your brother as a shield against this criticism- in another context one might almost say you're pimping him. i don't doubt for a second your feelings for him, but your behavior in this regard is curious, hypocritical even.
Yes, I was goading the lying ******* that accused me of hating children that suffer from a condition my brother suffers from. You look like an idiot here, as usual. Stop posting.
If this doesn't get you banned, I don't know what will. I'm leaving this thread now so as not to tell you to **** off again.
Batty at 11:48 AM ET Batty at 5:29 PM ET if you'd just made, and stuck to that pledge, 3 days ago all this could have been avoided.
I believe Jeff already made your point earlier. You know Batman has a short fuse. He may call you an a-hole, but the mods have decided that you were the instigator and he won't be punished. You then complained about the liberal bias in this forum. You continued to falsely accuse Batman. Then you accused him of pimping his DS brother? I'll go ahead and use a term my people like to use... you're a putz.
i think you missed my point. i was referring to the constant charge batman and others have made about she-who-must-not-be-seen-coddling-her-DS-kid.
You better make a damn good case that Batman accused Palin of "pimping" trig. From what I remember, it was the right who wrongly accused Obama supporters of making fun of Trig... the left followed those idiotic remarks with sarcastic rebuttals because 1. it was completely false and 2. it wasn't worth arguing about. You can make a claim, kick and scream, and then run away... but I would put money on the fact that if posters said anything negative towards Palin (or Trig) regarding DS it was meant to be sarcastic. There's humor, dark humor and then there's crossing the line. There is a big difference between attacking a politician/celebrity (or his/her family), an individual poster, and then a special needs sibling of an individual poster. I'll go ahead and admit that I have made some jokes about Palin in the past, but they were never personal... we all get caught up in politics and it gets very heated during election times. I've made some jokes that I would never say on this board or around my conservative friends. I know that when I offend somebody, even when it's meant to be a joke or to make a point, I make a point of apologizing... unless I have no plans on being civil. So the question remains. Do you want to be civil or do you want to be a putz? I have a feeling some of the higher ups on this board might not be too happy if you choose the latter.
where have a attacked any relative of a poster, much less Batty's brother? and check the thread i linked above from the RNC if you want to see some of the "jokes" folks made about Palin- and those were just the warm-ups.
Because you keep bringing up the DS topic OVER and OVER again. From what I gathered from your posts in this thread alone: Basso: You made fun of Palin and trig! You must really hate special needs children. Batman: I have a special needs brother. Basso: Hypocrite. Well then you love your brother but have disdain for all the other special needs children. Batman: A**hole. Basso: HELP ME MODS. Jeff: No. Basso: Stupid liberals and this biased board is out to get me. Batman: Because you're an a**hole. Basso: Well you still hate special needs children. Except for your brother of course.
I didn't even see the thread in his sig until now. Goes further to prove the point that 1. he craves negative attention on this board and enjoys being a political troll, 2. he knows how to push Batman's buttons and 3. he blatantly ignores the mods on this board by not abiding to Clutch's sig rules (it might have been different then but you're still linking to the D&D).
you left out the susbtative debate the preceded it, and my attempts to not engage w/ Batman, but otherwise, pretty close. i suppose one's perception is colored by how one feels about the issue or the poster(s) in question. and, i might add, whatever Batman took offense to, it's far less than what he dishes out on a (formerly drunken) nightly basis.
