On the front page it reads that Richardson is only 6'4, but I believe I read somewhere he actually measured taller than his listed height. I think it said he was 6'7 and in the article it said his value rose since some teams think he can be a SF now. Do I have him confused with someone else? Did I read a bogus post and think it was an article? ------------------ "You've got 6 fouls, use them well" -Derrick Coleman
Dude, I could have swore I read the exact opposite. I thought the story was he is rumored to be 6' 6" & is only going a marginal 6'4" & has lost some Stock. But then again, I have read allot of crazy articles about prospects lately ------------------
