1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Richard Jefferson

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Tony, May 31, 2002.

Tags:
  1. Tony

    Tony Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2000
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm watching the 6th game Boston vs Jersey, and this guy looks amazing, very confident, agile, and in the 2nd quarter he is truly the team leader.....Did we made a mistake by trading him? Can he play the SF position...?
     
  2. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    las summer was the worst offseason ive seen.

    we should have let ALL of our fa's go.

    sign webber. draft #13 jefferson, #18 haywood, #23 tinsley.

    last years line-up should have been:

    cato-haywood-coller
    webber-kt-Tmo
    jefferson-walt-langhi
    cat-os
    wink-tinsley-brown
     
  3. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    Richard Jefferson one day, if he plays hard, and progresses, might be a lesser version of Doug Christie.

    Eddie will be a star.

    Its a no brainer decision - decent player vs Star.
     
  4. hoopgod13

    hoopgod13 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    6
    Dude...i think Richard Jefferson is tha bomb. I think he'll top out at about 17 points 6 bounds a game...his size reminds me of Caron Butler...but doesn't really have that Paul Pierce attitude that Caron has (the will to win...go at all costs to score)...all in all, above-average NBA player.

    I hope E-Money will be great. A star? I dunno...hopefully a couple of all-star selections. I'm hoping for 18,7,and 2.5 (blocks) outta him eventually.

    IMO, both teams got exactly what they needed in the trade...we didn't need 3 1st round contracts...and the Nets added to become a very deep team to help them get where they are now.
     
  5. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    18,288
    Likes Received:
    7,445
    Jefferson is a punk and Griffin will prove to be the greater player. NOBODY HATES ON THE ROCKETS!!!!!! NOBODY!!!!! You got that Richie?!:mad:
     
  6. Lil Francis

    Lil Francis Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    3,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with you about Webber. He was there for the taking but Rudy would rather sign Moochie and Mo Taylor than get a proven superstar. Hopefully getting Odom or drafting Ming will make me forget about that.
     
  7. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,800
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    I was about to say the same thing.

    Jefferson is a f*cking punk. I wouldn't have him for a sack of ****.
     
  8. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    Jefferson is a "f*cking punk" going to the Finals. The Rockets are a team with Griffin still developing.
     
  9. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    I was thinking the same thing, only my wrinkle is this, "Does EG wish he had been kept by the Nets?"

    Nets to the Finals, ba-bee!

    EG will be a great pro, but how about #13 Richard Jefferson, #18 Brendan Haywood, and #23 Tony Parker on the Rockets instead?
     
  10. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,800
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    And they are going to get drilled by the West.

    *Yawn* - another exciting finals

    I guarandamntee that Griffin will have a more distinguished career and more "rings" than the punk, Jefferson.
     
  11. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just like the Nets were supposed to lose to the Pacers, Hornets, and Celtics.

    Griffin might have more rings than Jefferson if Griffin gets traded from the Rockets.
     
  12. Dennis2112

    Dennis2112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,187
    Likes Received:
    3

    All the credit in the world should goto the Nets for beating the teams they had to. They earned their trip to the finals.

    Now back to Jefferson....

    Griffin has a higher ceiling and is bigger physically. Jefferson has played well for a rookie and will get better in the years to come but I see Griffin reaching higher and having a bigger impact in the long run. IMHO

    How many rings will they get??? Who knows??
    I really do not consider number of rings a determining factor in who is the better player. Is Horace Grant a better PF than Karl Malone because he has more rings? As much as I hate Malone thats a no brainer. Malone may very well be the greatest PF ever ( I can not believe I just typed that ) :eek:
     
  13. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't either, and I think Malone is the best PF ever too, but Manny used that as a point. Not a great one. Griffin does have the potential to be better, but a lot of potential is not reached (although I think Griffin will be better than Jefferson, and I was really happy for the Nets the hour they had him).
     
  14. gr8-1

    gr8-1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    7,918
    Likes Received:
    4
    Don't remember any of the critics saying that. With Kidd and Martin, you guys have the requisite thugs to make it to the finals.


    EG could be a franchise player. Jefferson is a role player.
     
  15. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,800
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    I was trying to be civil and give you the benefit of the doubt, but I should have known better.

    How in the hell were the Nets supposed to lose to the Celtics, Hornets, and Pacers??

    They're the f*cking #1 seed in the East, genius...that means, duh, they're favored.

    We will see on who gets more rings...Jefferson or Griffin but I know one damn thing for sure...anybody who has the misfortune of playing on the sorryass Knicks team for the next 20 years or so will never even come close to sniffing a championship.
     
  16. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    Jefferson will be a solid player. More than a role player, but not a star. Probably about 17 points 4 rebounds and 3 assists in his prime.

    Dr. Jack had Nets in 4, Hornets in 6, and Celtics in 7. So much for being favored. I also listened to the Radio a lot around here. Many people thought the Nets were going to lose.
     
    #16 NYKRule, May 31, 2002
    Last edited: May 31, 2002
  17. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,800
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    Oh because Dr. Jack Ramsey said it, you take that as to be the gospel???

    ROTFLMFAO!!!!

    Umm..I hate to break it to you, Knicks fan, but Dr. Jack is a senile old fart who doesn't have a clue of what he is talking about.

    I mean, come on, who would honestly think the Celtics, a team that has no players for the most part with playoff experience, is going to win a Game 7 on the road??

    Bwhahahahahahahahaha
     
  18. NYKRule

    NYKRule Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    1
    I hate Jack Ramsey too (huge ties with the Heat), but it wasn't just him, he's the only one that I can find on a site right now.

    Its not like the Nets had much playoff exp either, just Kidd and MacCulloch.
     
  19. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    2,706
    Whatever...everyone knows the Nets are at best a seventh seed in the west and would already have taken an early first round exit. Not that many people said New Jersey didn't have a chance. Most of the opinions I heard were more along the lines of, "the eastern conference is so crappy that any team could win it." Noone was really favoring the Nets like they were favoring the Lakers, so it did appear as if they were slighting them, when in fact there just wasn't any team good enough in the East to be declared as a clear-cut favorite.

    Just for the record, I've picked every winner except some Detroit over Toronto. I picked the Lakers to beat the Nets in the finals. I'd post a link to the original pre-playoff predictions, but I can't find it.
     
    #19 DCkid, May 31, 2002
    Last edited: May 31, 2002
  20. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now