Puddle of CRAP!

bamaslammer · Feb 1, 2004

Originally posted by wizkid83
Aww come on, Nirvana was not pathetic. They were a good band and they killed hair metal and boy bands (new kids on the block). They were able to translate cynicism for our current society into on album that redefined teenage angst and forced it into the masses. They were a band that never looked for fame (didn't even have a deal when they become big) and will now go down as one of the most influentials bands ever.

Puddle of Mudd and many other bands on the other hand, are considered really really bad because they are just over produced wannnabe version of Nirvana that are just not as good. Nirvana's music isn't because that they have amazing technical abilities but because you can see soul in Kurt's songs and lyrics, as well as his voice. , if you would've seen the unplugged performance on mtv from him, you'll know what I am saying.

So please, don't put the two on the same level
Click to expand...

Sorry, but I just don't see any soul in Kurt Cobain. I look for musicianship and creativity in the music I listen to and find it lacking from Nirvana and most rock bands of today. DMB is outstanding, Phish is good, but the rest.....awful, noisy, rubbish. But cut me some slack, I'm 35 and the rock thing died for me a long time ago.

Forums

Puddle of CRAP!

bamaslammer Member

Share This Page

About ClutchFans

Rockets Content

Support ClutchFans!