yeah, battlefield is known to need teamwork.. but really, the only game that depends on squad teamwork for success is Rush attack. Rush defense, conquest, and squad deathmatch are all pretty much independent games - as long as you kill a bunch of guys on your own - your side will generally win the match.
They make COD feel more like an arcade game everyear, i'm not diggin it. thats why Battlefield is so much better
What i'm saying is battlefield doesn't give you kill rewards for kill streaks, just points, which is what i prefer, and with the small maps in call of duty, most people just run around with mini shotguns or ballistic knives and kill people repeatedly making it a disadvantage for snipers or long range shooters. And i'm talking about a video game, not real life.
Well those kill rewards give you kills, which bring even MORE points, which is why i prefer kill rewards. And what you said about the ballistic knifes and shotguns, do you even play CoD? If you did, you would know thats not true.
I just bought a PS3 from amazon. It should get here by next week. I also own a XBOX360. I am thinking about picking MW3 up to play online with couple of friends. Should I buy it for the PS3 for the free online play? Or is the 360 version that much better that's worth the monthly service fee? Or should I not buy the game at all?
