Heres a crazy thought about a houston/Det trade. Well i think it might actually work for houston. With Dumars wanting to soften and make his roster young. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gjkOomGvppsDIpwfJ5P438L5s0swD9FU0MA00 Would a productive trade of Martin/Hill/J.Taylor. For R.Hamiliton and #7 Pick in the 2010 draft? Greg Monroe at 7 ? Good or bad trade?
<a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://img442.imageshack.us/i/threadcrapgraph.jpg/'><img src='http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8545/threadcrapgraph.jpg' border='0'/></a>
yes, But Hamilton, With experience of the playoffs, with Yao, and ariza, With Brooks and Scola. Is a damn good team. Not only with battier off the bench. Maybe old but scola is nearly 30. And Monroe can be the PF of the future for H-Town.
Give away a relatively young SG who hasnt peaked, a lottery pick legit PF from last year, for an over the hill SG and an unknown pick this year? No thanks
i wonder how that trade would have worked out. billups is still really good but at this point i'd take martin, hill, and the picks.
This will make us older and slower in the backcourt. Monroe is better than Hill,but this is not worth it. Rip is not the man he used to be.
Usually when some one proposes a completely ridiculous trade idea it works out lopsidedly for us... not in this case. Spoiler Come on, man. That's terrible.
I understand robert horry is available if you are looking for playoff experience. this trade made me want to watch idiocracy again, and soak up its prophetic wisdow
Ya man im just throwing it out there. Martin to me seems so injury prone and he only avgs like 50 games a year. So i would think Ham would mean better now, since yao might crack in 2 years are so. But who knows. Its all good, maybe hill can be a 7 rpg and 10 ppg game guy
Ya make me look stupid but look at the red part of the pie chart dumb ass it means rockets Hamiliton needs a reboost, and i think monroe can be a monster for houston.
