1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

MicroChip implantation

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Oct 14, 2004.

  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,255
    Likes Received:
    32,965
    scary Stuff

    http://my.ev1.net/english/news/newsarticle.asp?articleID=42392775&subject=technology

    FDA Approves Use of Chip in Patients




    Privacy advocates are concerned that an implantable microchip designed to help doctors tap into a patient's medical records could undermine confidentiality or could even be used to track the patient's movements.


    "If privacy protections aren't built in at the outset, there could be harmful consequences for patients," said Emily Stewart, a policy analyst at the Health Privacy Project.


    The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Fla., could market the VeriChip, an implantable computer chip about the size of a grain of rice, for storing medical information.


    With the pinch of a syringe, the microchip is inserted under the skin in a procedure that takes less than 20 minutes and requires no stitches. Silently and invisibly, the dormant chip stores a code that releases patient-specific information when a scanner passes over it.


    The VeriChip itself contains no medical records, just codes that can be scanned and revealed in a doctor's office or hospital. With that code, doctors can unlock part of a secure database that holds the patient's medical information, including allergies and prior treatment. The electronic database, not the chip, would be updated with each medical visit.


    The microchips have already been implanted in 1 million pets. But the chip's possible use to track people's movements
    in addition to speeding delivery of medical information to emergency rooms
    has raised alarm.


    The company's chief executive officer, Scott R. Silverman, said chips implanted for medical uses could also be used for security purposes, like tracking employee movement through nuclear power plants.


    Stewart said that to protect patient privacy, the devices should reveal only vital medical information, like blood type and allergic reactions, needed for health care workers to do their jobs.


    An information technology guru at Detroit Medical Center said he will lobby for his center's inclusion in a VeriChip pilot program.


    "One of the big problems in health care has been the medical records situation. So much of it is still on paper," said David Ellis, the center's chief futurist and co-founder of the Michigan Electronic Medical Records Initiative.


    "It's part of the future of medicine to have these kinds of technologies that make life simpler for the patient," Ellis said. Strong encryption algorithms will ensure hackers can't nab medical data, he said.


    The Health and Human Services Department on Wednesday announced $139 million in grants to help make real President Bush's push for electronic health records for most Americans within a decade.


    William A. Pierce, an HHS spokesman, could not say whether VeriChip and its accompanying secure database of medical records fit within that initiative.


    "Exactly what those technologies are is still to be sorted out," Pierce said. "It all has to respect and comport with the privacy rules."


    To kickstart the chip's use among humans, Applied Digital will provide $650 scanners for free at 200 of the nation's trauma centers.


    In pets, installing the chip costs owners about $50. For humans, the chip implantation cost would be $150 to $200, said Angela Fulcher, an Applied Digital spokeswoman.


    Ultimately, the company hopes patients who suffer from such ailments as diabetes and Alzheimer's or who undergo complex treatments, like chemotherapy, would have chips implanted.
     
  2. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    hey, remember that part in 1984 where the government straps the cage with the rats in it to the main character's head, knowing that his worst fear is rats?
     
  3. SWTsig

    SWTsig Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,055
    Likes Received:
    3,755
    isn't this all in revelations? chips implanted into hands, all money becoming electronic (fasing out checks)....

    people, armaggedon is upon us.
     
  4. Chump

    Chump Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    all your privacy are belong to us
     
  5. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    I actually like the idea, but my lack of distaste comes from a basic understanding of the technical issues. The person's medical records would NOT be stored on the chip, only a cipher (basically an unlock code) that would allow a healthcare practitioner to access the patient's records. This way, the only person who could POSSIBLY authorize someone to see their medical records would be the patient themself [sic?].

    The part that would bother me would be any identifying or tracking information (or even the ability to track the chips at all) stored in the chip itself. If an employer wanted to be able to track the movements of their employees through their facilities (like the nuclear plant example that was cited), there would be other, less obtrusive ways to make that happen.
     
  6. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    chips implanted in us to monitor our private medical records???

    what could possibly go wrong?
     
  7. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    The chips wouldn't monitor our medical records, they would act as a key that we always carry and nobody else could forge or use.
     
  8. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    what could possibly go wrong? ;)
     
  9. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,425
    Likes Received:
    9,373
    Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling.
    Forty years of darkness. Earthquakes, volcanoes...
    The dead rising from the grave.
    Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria!





    sorry, couldn't resist ;)
     
  10. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Don't get me wrong, there is a HUGE list of issues that would have to be addressed to make this truly palatable to me, but the basic idea of a key to your medical records that nobody else can possibly get their hands on, forge, or use is a good one.
     

Share This Page