1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Cuttino for Wilcox

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by pasox2, May 27, 2004.

  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,914
    Likes Received:
    41,461
    The Knicks in 96 when they brought in Houston, Larry Johnson & Chris Childs were the last team to make a huge revamping like that. But it's probably the exception that proves the rule.
     
  2. pasox2

    pasox2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2001
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    47
    I have not yet begun to trade!

    If you prefer, I can certainly dump JJ, Boki, A Griff and Padgett, too.

    Look, there was absolutely nothing of value gained last season. Nothing. It was a total waste of time. There is no chemistry. Don't like trades ? A plane crash is the only other way to rebuild this team. They're not going to change who they are, they're not going to get any smarter, they're not going to stop making stupid mistakes and bad decisions, they're not going to presto! Get fundamentals. This is who they are. They don't play together so blow them up, the sooner the better.

    If anything, I'm more inclined to retain less than 3 players, after the cursed stain of the old way of losing has ruined them.
     
  3. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390

    No progress? That is absurd.
     
  4. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love Wilcox, and would do that deal in a split second.

    Even though Wilcox's shooting isn't tremendous, he has the ability to take advantage of double teams on Yao the same way Malik Rose does - when he gets the ball, he explodes furiously to the basket and slams it down.

    It's absurd to think that, at this age, he won't improve his jumpshot. He's already got a good touch, great rebounder, NBA body, and 2 years of experience in the league.

    He might breakout at any time.

    However, that trade leaves us with 4 PF's - MoT, Wilcox, Cato, Weatehrspoon.

    If they need capsapce for Kobe, I would look at taking a re-signed Q Richardson straight up for the TE as well. But I really don't think they can get Kobe, so it's a moot point.
     
  5. pasox2

    pasox2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2001
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    47
    Kobe will stay in LA.

    I'm hearing it more and more.

    Q will leave. Besides, Cuttino is better than Q. They can get Cat for a year at 5.5 instead of offering Q whatever on a longer term deal.

    LAC can move a little closer to a respectable attack with the Cat. I don't like him with Yao, but he looks good with Brand and Mags.
     
  6. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think Cat is better than Q.

    I think they're equal, but they bring different things to the table.

    Richarson is a shooter, more powerful, more athletic. Mobley is a better defender, better with the ball in his hands, and more experienced.
     
  7. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,184
    Likes Received:
    2,831
    Cat had a higher FG%, higher 3pt%, and higher adjusted FG%. How exactly is Richardson a better shooter? In fact, it seems like the only thin Richardson is really better at is rebounding. People sure seem to put a lot of weight on rebounding guards around here.
     
    #27 StupidMoniker, May 27, 2004
    Last edited: May 27, 2004
  8. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    First show me where I said better shooter.
     
  9. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,184
    Likes Received:
    2,831
    It was implied when you listed shooter as one of Q's attributes and contrasted it with Mobley's defense and ball handling.
     
  10. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    No it wasn't.
     
  11. Bassfly

    Bassfly Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2002
    Messages:
    970
    Likes Received:
    16
    Cuttino's best attribute is his perimeter defense. He held Kobe to 38% shooting. Since the LA-HOU series, Kobe has shot 48%against the likes of Bruce Bowen and Trenton Hassell, regarded as some of the top defenders in the league. I think alot of people on this board underrate Cuttino's value in that respect.
     
  12. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed. We don't give Cuttino enough credit for his defense, although I don't think ANYONE shoots as well against the Rockets as they do other teams. Yao Ming and Kelvin Cato go a long way in helping that, but ultimately, Mobley did a superb job.
     
  13. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,415
    Likes Received:
    39,978
    Good point, he is our best perimeter defender.

    BUT....Wilcox improves our team.

    DD
     
  14. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I think I'd rather trade Francis for Wilcox and a boatload of other stuff (e.g., either Maggette or like the #6 pick plus Jaric, etc) than trade Cat for Wilcox. Francis is a much bigger star who would have a much greater impact elsewhere like with the Clips (thus worth much more in a trade), but I can't see a big advantage for the Rockets keeping him over Mobley when you consider Mobley is the much superior defender and just as good spot up shooter.
     
  15. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    I've kind of been thinking the same thing. If this whole Tmac thing doesn't work out (sounds like a lot of posturing is going on), I think we can pull off something here. Maybe Steve for Maggette, Wilcox, and Jaric. Toss in a future first rounder if it's too lopsided. This deal would kind of remind me of the Jalen Rose for Artest, Miller, and Mercer deal a couple of years ago. We would be giving up the bigger talent to get a number of good pieces.

    Jaric
    Cat
    Maggette
    Wilcox
    Yao

    I can definitely see this becoming one of the top running teams in the league. Along with JVG's strong defensive scheme I think it could a big time contender with about two seasons of maturation.
     
  16. madmonkey37

    madmonkey37 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    52
    I would do this trade. Q has a lot of interest in the free agent market, especially from Denver who has considerable cap room. If Denver offeres too much it might scare off sterling like how Miami got Odom. Considering Mobley is only around 5 mill per season I could see the clips replacing Q with him.

    Mobley brings good spot up shooting and perimter defense, but shooting guards are a dime a dozen. He can easily be replaced and I could see JJ doing better at the 2 instead of 3 since he isnt guarding people bigger then him. Mobley is a good player and underated, but we might get a long term solution at the 4 in return and that cant be ignored.

    When Brand was out for the beggining of the season it was wilcox who stepped up and played pretty well for them.

    Remember a bigman is always more valuable then a guard these days.

    We are pretty stacked at the 2 and 3 positions with pike, boki, agriff and jj. Its a risk im willing to take if wilcox pans out and becomes a good pf.
     

Share This Page