1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Coincidence or Not?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by giddyup, Feb 7, 2013.

  1. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,807
    Likes Received:
    20,465
    There might be a way, but again it is more unlikely that all of those hoops were jumped through than that he just wasn't a registered Democrat which is the simplest explanation. Like I said when your posts weren't outright disproven they were shown to be much more unlikely.

    So he's not a Democrat or a leftist and doesn't fit into the point you're trying to make.

    You've provided no other sources. The sources we've seen show that your claim is most likely bogus


    Maybe, but since it's inconclusive then you're finding is inconclusive as well and not really much to talk about and discuss.
    I don't recall one single parent killing that had to do with rejecting the parental political affiliations. The son lived with his mother, went to shooting ranges with his mother, He was home schooled by her, and given her version of education, and obviously had ties with his mother. This might be the hugest stretch you've made yet.
    David Brooks is a conservative writer. The fact that he's published by the Times doesn't change his political leanings.

    Your rebuttals only made you go to more extremes to find even more improbable ways for your claims to somehow still have the tiniest chance of being true.

    Again you've chosen a stance and are going out of your way to rationalize it. The simplest explanations as already listed blow your claims out of the water, or make them incredibly unlikely.
     
  2. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    The claim was made that since VA doesn't allow party affiliation upon voter registration that Nadal was NOT a registered Democrat. That was deduced fromo a false premise that her registered in his home state. It's not a stretch to think that an 18 YO who joined the military right out of HS may just register to vote while in the military. Nothing is proven-- just talking about probabilities. The author of the Examiner piece jumps to a conclusion of FALSEHOOD based on a feature that may or may not be applicable.

    Not sure what you mean here. Most of GWB's harsh critics (and submitting apparently numerous angry letters would seem to qualify one as a harsh critic) are, in fact, leftists and/or Democrats. They are not Republicans. THis does fit the point I'm trying to make because this "evidence" points more to Cho being sympathetic to Democrat values (althoug a non-registered voter).

    See everything above and the rest to follow. All t his piece does is de-bunk a couple pieces of the evidence. It itself provides no proof of anything-- except that Cho could not be a registered Democrat because he's not even a citizen. I don't think the orignial blog post made that claim, did it? I erased it earlier. Didn't it just talk about the angry series of letters written?


    I erased one of the claims that was PROVEN false-- mostly about Cho's lack of registration due to citizenship issues. So it's a stretch to think that a young man who slaughters his own mother with gunfire had rejected her and her values. I think the stretching is being done by you. Again, we have no proof of anything.

    So you are saying he is LYING?

    Out of my way? It was pretty simple really. Look at what the counter-claims actually said and then analyze how it impacted the OP.
     
  3. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,235
    Jesus... Give it a rest OP, it is getting painful to watch you humiliate yourself further. Go baby sit some of your elementary students and get back to sucking off the tax payers.
     
  4. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,051
    I agree your thread is stupid. That's about it. There's a gigantic difference between people that support a principle and those that commit crimes that are enabled by the support of that principle.
     
  5. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    Someone let me know when Nook has something substantive to contribute rather than these tasteless jibes. I think he is capable but maybe not.
     
  6. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,235
    I gave up contributing substance to this thread because you have offered NOTHING of substance. Your "point" has fluctuated through out the thread, and have been beaten down by a number of posters.. as stated, it was pathetic....... but at this point, is boring.
     

Share This Page