1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Cato/Langhi for Oakley????

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by WoodlandsBoy, Nov 14, 2001.

  1. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    Houston trades: Kelvin Cato $6,048,000 to Chicago
    Houston trades: Dan Langhi $465,850 to Chicago
    TOTAL: $6,513,850

    Chicago trades: Charles Oakley $7,526,750 to Houston
    TOTAL: $7,526,750

    TRADE ACCEPTED

    Due to Houston being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked. Houston had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    That would be my dream come true. Could you imagine Oak and Willis defending Shaq??? Plus we could send Langhi to a team that could use a shooter.
     
  2. boomboom

    boomboom I GOT '99 PROBLEMS

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 1999
    Messages:
    12,769
    Likes Received:
    9,424
    How about Cato for one of those blow-up clown punching things that have sand in the bottom. At least the clown wouldn't get called for fouls flailing his arms around and he'd set awesome picks.
     
  3. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    This trade does not satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement but will satisfy all Rockets fan.
     
  4. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    Throw in Walt, and maybe we can get Miller too.

    j/k, Walt's the man. Crisco calculated that he's actually the best player on the team, if you throw out all of the games except that first game from last season.
     
  5. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,815
    Likes Received:
    5,222
    I think we give up too much potential in the trade proposal.
     
  6. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    On a serious note, I think this looks like a good trade to me, depending on how long Oakley's contract is. Essentially right now we are getting absolutely nothing out of Cato and Langhi combined. Oakley will at least give us some production. The only issue is it leaves us with one player who can truly play center in Willis, and he is quite old. But I'd rather have two power forwards out there most of the time than Cato anyway.
     
  7. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    So you wouldn't do the trade??? Langhi might be good someday but is needed to complete the trade.
     
  8. A-Train

    A-Train Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    15,997
    Likes Received:
    39
    <b>Houston trades: Walt Williams $5,000,000 to Minnesota
    Houston trades: Glen Rice $8,800,000 to Minnesota
    Houston trades: Kelvin Cato $6,048,000 to Minnesota
    TOTAL: $19,848,000


    Minnesota trades: Kevin Garnett $22,400,000 to Houston
    TOTAL: $22,400,000

    TRADE ACCEPTED</b>

    Sounds good to me...
     
  9. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    Oakley is in his last year....
     
  10. Achebe

    Achebe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 1999
    Messages:
    6,237
    Likes Received:
    3
    cha-ching!
     
  11. WoodlandsBoy

    WoodlandsBoy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    4
    Wouldn't that slow EGs development:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  12. SmeggySmeg

    SmeggySmeg Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 1999
    Messages:
    14,887
    Likes Received:
    123
    ROFLMAO
     
  13. Puedlfor

    Puedlfor Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2000
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    21
    Icky.

    Charles Oakley brings nothing this team needs.
     
  14. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,056
    Likes Received:
    15,230
    Good trade for us but I hate Oakley. So, I'd say no.
     
  15. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,815
    Likes Received:
    5,222
    That is why I wouldn't do it. Even though he is a nice player, I don't think he can get us over the hump.
     
  16. MManal

    MManal Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2000
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    1
    Not sure whether or not I'd do this trade b/c of potential chemistry issues in the locker room with Oakley, however if Cato's trade value has increased enough to find a taker, I'd go for it. This is assuming ofcourse that the Rockets dont have to take a big contract of an unproductive player in return. The appeal of this possibility is that Oakley is in the last year of his contract and would provide some more veteran beef inside; however, the downside of chemistry clashes and such may be too much of a risk.

    Ive watched Cato closely this season and feel he has improved as was supposed to be the case. However, I dont feel the improvement is enough to really warrant hanging onto him at all costs.
     
  17. ROXRAN

    ROXRAN Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    18,815
    Likes Received:
    5,222
    yea, getting rid of Cato for almost anything might be beneficial...
     
  18. Hottoddie

    Hottoddie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2000
    Messages:
    3,075
    Likes Received:
    15
    I like this trade better. :D

    Houston trades: Tierre Brown $332,817 to Chicago
    Houston trades: Kelvin Cato $6,048,000 to Chicago
    Houston trades: Dan Langhi $465,850 to Chicago
    Houston trades: Walt Williams $5,000,000 to Chicago
    TOTAL: $11,846,667


    Chicago trades: Ron Artest $1,241,760 to Houston
    Chicago trades: Eddy Curry $2,678,400 to Houston
    Chicago trades: Marcus Fizer $2,754,120 to Houston
    Chicago trades: Brad Miller $4,400,000 to Houston (plus Trade Kicker $690,000)
    TOTAL: $11,074,280






    TRADE ACCEPTED
     
  19. RichRocket

    RichRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2000
    Messages:
    2,047
    Likes Received:
    2
    That's a close one, Hottoddie!
     
  20. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would Chicago do this trade?

    they have Brad Miller, who's doing wonders for them so far. Plus, they're trying to give Curry some playing time. As well as Fizer and Chandler. With Miller and Cato, there might not be enough playing time.

    This would be great for the Rocks, because I'm comfortable with Willis starting at C backed up by Collier. KT and Oakley at the 4.

    That's a tough, experienced, solid rotation.

    but it doesn't benefit Chicago unless we take Fizer and give them KT and a draft pick. Then we'd have a balanced trade.
     

Share This Page