1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Cato for Jamison

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DaDakota, Dec 24, 2003.

?

Cato for Jamison

  1. Yes

    159 vote(s)
    66.8%
  2. No

    79 vote(s)
    33.2%
  1. GATER

    GATER Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2000
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    78
    leebigez -
    Nothing personal this logic is pure BS. If Rice had any value, the Jazz would've turned his arse into Jamison, or SAR. And if Golden State was looking for instant capspace, they wouldn't have traded Jamison for Van Exel.
     
  2. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think SAR's a better player, but maybe Jamison would fit better.

    However, no way in hell I deal Francis for Jamison.

    However, I'd probably do something like Cato + Mobley for Finley. Maybe Cato + exception for Jamison + Josh Howard.

    Jamison makes 4M more than Cato, a substantial amount to us.

    Mobley + Cato for Josh Howard, Shawn Bradley and Jamison is a deal I'd also think about.
     
  3. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0

    I'd like to add to this by saying we still have a 7M trade exception and Amaechi's 2M dollar expiring contract. So if we were willing to do it, we could still do the same thing sans Griffin.
     
  4. crash5179

    crash5179 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2000
    Messages:
    16,468
    Likes Received:
    1,297
    Amaechi has a player option he can use to extend his contract doesn't he?
     
  5. KALIKULI

    KALIKULI Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2000
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    16
    I'll take this trade with both hands and feet tied down! This is a great trade!!:)
     
  6. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    I am in Dallas for Christmas, and they say that the Mavs are actively looking for a center.

    Bradley is out indefinitly, and they are looking to get someone that will be a defensive presence at the center spot.

    Jamison is expendable to Dallas as his 6th man role shows.

    I think the Mavs would seriously consider it, and with our 6.5 million trade exception, we could easily consumate it.

    CD, if you are reading this....MAKE THE CALL !!!


    The Mavericks philosophy is that everyone on the floor is a threat at all times. It also is ideally that everyone can expect a pass at any time and quickly convert (the Sacramento strategy). Cato brings nothing to the table for the Mavericks in these regards - having him out there is a liability for them <I>given their chosen style of play</I>. If you free up a man to start doubling whoever has the ball, the Mavs' offense strategy goes to crap - it depends on everyone being a real threat.
     
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,942
    Likes Received:
    39,390
    Then how do you explain Danny Fortsan, Shawn Bradley, and Eduardo Najera?

    Dallas would consider it, it could not hurt.

    DD
     
  8. Man

    Man Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    I like your 2nd and 3rd ideas...1st one..I'd rather just keep Mobley and Cato.

    I like Josh Howard. He's good. If Mavs really want Cato, they will have to give us Josh plus JamisoN!
     
  9. Man

    Man Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    Yeah Jamison is awesome. He's not overrated at all. He can shoot 3's. He can pass. He's athletic. He has a very nice touch..very graceful around the basket. Very fast inside. He's quicker than most. He is smaller too..so I don't know if I would give up Cato! Cato has been the guy leading our defense in my opinion. He is like the backbone. If we really need offense...then get Jamison. I like him. I think the Mavs would like Cato..they have plenty of offense to cover for him...but Cato has been great for us some games. I still think we need offense. I'd rather get Shareef Abdur Rahim actually.
     
  10. tierre_brown

    tierre_brown Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    82
    Yao still only plays 34 minutes a game, up substantially from his 29 last year, but I think he has to play around 38 to be the force we need him to be. Everyone voting yes for the trade, you do realize that John Amaechi would be our backup to Yao? John Amaechi will not cut it in the Western Conference, if we want to go anywhere. Sure Cato is a liability on offense. But he brings to the table what Ben Wallace does, although, granted, he isn't quite as dominant on the defensive end or quite as inept on the offensive end. Watching the Lakers game, he was pretty good guarding Shaq, and during the Clippers game, he was just EVERYWHERE.

    The only way I do this trade is if I am sure that I have locked up a good backup center, whether off of the waiver wire, in the Jamison for Cato trade itself, or in a different trade.
     
  11. vibe

    vibe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    0
    NO TRADES!!!
     
  12. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1
    Great Post!
     
  13. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    Then how do you explain Danny Fortsan, Shawn Bradley, and Eduardo Najera?

    Dallas would consider it, it could not hurt.


    I explain it by the fact that they don't play much. Why don't they play? See my original post.

    If they are going to trade Jamison, they can get someone who actually fits well in their system for him.
     
  14. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,681
    Likes Received:
    16,205
    Then how do you explain Danny Fortsan, Shawn Bradley, and Eduardo Najera?

    Dallas would consider it, it could not hurt.


    Fortson averages 5 rebounds in 12 minutes. If they want to put a Cato out there, they already have him.
     
  15. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong. Fortson is too small to play C, and isn't half the defensive player Cato is right now.

    Despite Fortson's strong rebounding numbers, the one thing everyone eneds to realize is that he's not good at anything - not even defense.
     
  16. Manny Ramirez

    Manny Ramirez The Music Man

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    28,799
    Likes Received:
    5,745
    Interesting trade proposal, Dakota, but I would not do it.

    As others have said, losing Cato would kill us in terms of a backup C and as crazy as this sounds, we need KC because he has the toughness that Yao lacks right now.

    Add to the fact that Jamison is a tweener and has a terrible contract, I don't see how this deal can help us that much.

    I would trade Cato if we can get a bruising PF - one that will score in the low block AND rebound (something that is foreign to Mo Taylor). However, as much as I hate to say this - I don't see who we can trade to get this type of player. Plus I don't know if this ideal 4 that I am talking about is even available.

    Oh and I find it humorous that several people have been throwing SAR's name around - one that I mentioned last season and everyone, it seems, thought I was crazy for wanting him. I would love for us to get SAR somehow, but I do not want to trade Mobley or Cato for him, at least not now.
     
  17. ym11

    ym11 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    If fighting with Lakers, then Cato can do a better job , Dallas would consider it.
     
  18. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    The thing about SAR is, I feel like he slows down his team, he's always in a lower gear.

    I can't imagine he'd be the answer to our fast break, spacing, or passing problems.

    What DON'T we get from Mo? Extra toughness, and excellent rebounding. Sar is only an improvement in the rebounding department, while being every bit as undersized as Mo.

    If JVG was going to let a non-bruiser, scorer to play next to Yao Ming, I think he'd have let Mo start by now.


    In terms of better player, SAR may be superior to Jamison. However, I think Jamison would be a better fit, especially if he can hit an open 15-footer (which I expect a MAX player can do).

    However, SAR makes around 27M over the next 2 seasons, while Jamison is tied up....Oh, FOREVER for the MAX alloweable.
     
  19. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    It's about winning
    -- No current NBA player has been around longer or played in more games without getting in the playoffs than Shareef Abdur-Rahim. But while the Hawks reached the weekend with the worst record in the NBA, Abdur-Rahim leads the East in efficiency rating and his team in scoring, rebounding and field goal percentage (49.8).

    "I don't take the `Woe is me' attitude -- in this or in life," Abdur-Rahim said. "You're faced with adversity, and you deal with it. I'm positive I'm going to win in this league. I'm not worried about that."

    But Abdur-Rahim said he would not feel right to be selected by the coaches for a second trip to the All-Star game.

    "It wouldn't even feel right, honestly," Abdur-Rahim said. "Success, as far as I'm concerned, is winning games. Success is not scoring points. From a statistical standpoint, those things -- I hope -- are done in the effort toward winning and not done in the effort toward anything else. If it starts to be something else other than that, then I have to examine myself and look at myself."

    http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/2323720
     
  20. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111
    At first glance, this seems like a no brainer. But, Cato has been the anchor of the defense all year long.

    Sure he doesn't show up on the stats page, "believe me I look after every game". But Cato as big a part of our 3-man PF/C combination as is Yao. Yao, is still learning the game. And Taylor is learning the game as well "funny about Taylor, but it's true".

    Cato is playing his best basketball for his level of talent. Best of all, Cato is nothing but a plus while in the game. Sure he has taken a couple of bone headed 18 foot jumpers, but if he started hitting that shot, it would make him an all star the way defenses play him. But he doesn't take so many of them that you would say it hurts the team.

    And you guys want to trade him for Jamison!!!!!

    Granted I haven't seen much of Jamison, but what would happen to our interior defense without Cato? We esentially take away one of our strenght for a position that Jackson is holding his own on. From what I hear Jamison is making all the money in the Basketball World, but his impact on the game doesn't leave that big of a crater on the results. In the Mavericks system Walker has proven that he is a better player than Jamison.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now