1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Are You A Tanker?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DarkHorse, Mar 11, 2002.

?

Tank or No?

  1. The Lotto Take: Winning is a cancer

    14 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. The Clutch Take: Don't sacrifice development just to win more games, higher draft pick is nice

    28 vote(s)
    40.0%
  3. The Dignity Take: Every win counts. Never say die.

    25 vote(s)
    35.7%
  4. The Rose Colored Take: Playoffs baby! Time for the final push!

    3 vote(s)
    4.3%
  1. DarkHorse

    DarkHorse Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    6,756
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    This has gone from what I thought was a worthwhile <a href=http://bbs.clutchcity.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29958>discussion<a/> of the future, to something much much worse.

    Are there really people in this forum that believe we should deliberately lose games to get a higher draft pick? Should Rudy pull Steve aside and have a talk about the good of the franchise in the long run? Is it short-sided to win games now?

    The playoffs are a fargone conclusion. We have a logjam at the 4, a backup center, and plentiful mediocrity at small forward. We could really use a nice 3 or 5.

    We have a nice nucleus in Francis, Griffin, and Mobley. Is it enough?

    What do you really think? What direction do we take if you have the reigns?

    :)
     
    #1 DarkHorse, Mar 11, 2002
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2002
  2. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    They are playing for next year at this point in time. Might as well be game-testing the rest of the squad to see where they are on the development curve: Collier, Langhi, Brown, Morris.

    Keep Oscar in the bank, though.

    Losing 18 out of 25 instead of 12 will not ruin our "winning" mentality.

    It's not tanking; it's franchise development.
     
  3. DiSeAsEd MoNkEy

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,587
    Likes Received:
    1
  4. harumph

    harumph Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2001
    Messages:
    592
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMHO if you tank once, you'll end up in the lottery for a few years. Looking at the performance of the teams which have tanked in the recent past* backs this up. This is due to the mind set created, the negative impact in morale and the loss of actual confidence.

    We should aim to win every game, then let CD work his draft day magic again (2 out of the last 3 years he has done exceptionally well) with the extra draft pick/trades.

    *San Antonio not "rushing back" david robinson did not change the team mind set, as he was already out all season. They chose not to improve the team when they had the chance.
     
    #4 harumph, Mar 11, 2002
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2002
  5. enbehay

    enbehay Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2001
    Messages:
    511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you a tanker? -- Is that anything like an oiler?
     
  6. Will

    Will Clutch Crew
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    10,269
    Carpe Lotto!
     
  7. AstroRocket

    AstroRocket Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 1999
    Messages:
    11,814
    Likes Received:
    458
    Win at all times. Under no conditions should you lose games on purpose. I couldn't root for a team that took that kind of mentality.
     
  8. DarkHorse

    DarkHorse Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    6,756
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Kind of scary. Most people seem to be more in favor of tanking, or at least not trying to get every win.

    Personally, my view is a lot closer to the Clutch Take. I don't see any point in scraping out a couple more wins if we're just going to play Steve and Cuttino 42 minutes every night, while Eddie and Terrence get 20, and Oscar only gets token appearances, etc.

    To his credit, Rudy has been giving Eddie a lot more playing time lately, even when he hasn't played well. And Terrence is getting a lot more time than I thought he would. What about Dan and Jason? Are they in the plans for the future at all?

    Questions to ponder...

    :)
     
  9. lpbman

    lpbman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2001
    Messages:
    4,240
    Likes Received:
    816
    Riding Steve and Cuttino 40+ minutes a game is silly
    Don't tank, but don't kill you're stars in a sunken season.
    Langhi not getting any playing time really puzzles me.
    I mean, for a "mismatch" offense, isn't a 6"10 sf something worth exploring more? Especially after the nice preseason performance.

    Ah well trust in Rudy i suppose
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now