1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Airplane] What happens?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by WWR, Oct 25, 2007.

  1. thelasik

    thelasik Contributing Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,347
    Likes Received:
    72
    Chill out.
     
  2. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,428
    Likes Received:
    945
    Seems like my last post was the last on the previous page. that sucks.
     
  3. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    The plane will lift off twice as fast -- many of you are forgetting to take into account the statistical mechanics of interacting systems along with the Theory of Plane Transitions.
     
  4. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    18,164
    Likes Received:
    8,574
    If the plane will take off on the conveyor, then it should be reasoned that the conveyor has no bearing on take-off.... whether it impedes or helps.
     
  5. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429
    I am going to call an Exorcist to kill this thread once and for all!!!


    IN A NUTSHELL:

    The 'riddle' is poorly presented, because the parameters of the 'experiment' are not rigidly defined.

    And that's important, because it directly affects the outcome.

    There are two possibilities:

    1) If the parameters require that the 'treadmill' be able to completely NULLIFY all forward motion granted by the rotation of the wheels, NO MATTER HOW FAST THE WHEELS TURN, then the plane WILL NOT TAKE OFF. In other words, in this scenario, the treadmill NEGATES all forward motion.

    2) If the parameters require only that the 'treadmill' simply IMPEDE the progress of the plane, but do not entirely nullify the forward motion of the plane on its wheels, then the plane is able to break free from the grip of gravity, and with the plane's engines working on the AIR and no longer the GROUND, the plane WILL TAKE OFF, rather easily in fact.


    All of this endless debate is a direct result of the poor presentation of the 'riddle', and a general lack of understanding of the physics involved from the vast majority of the people bandying it about.
     
  6. Mulder

    Mulder Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    7,118
    Likes Received:
    81
  7. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    This thread will remain active at least until Mythbusters FINALLY shows their segment dealing with this.
     
  8. Franchise3

    Franchise3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    30
    I used to agree with you on this, but after thinking about it more and more, I don't think scenario #1 can actually happen.
     
  9. famicom

    famicom Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    50
    Once mythbusters show the results, this thread will OFFICIALLY become the "What was wrong with the Mythbusters experiment to cause the result."
     
  10. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,447
    Likes Received:
    1,429

    Of course it couldn't actually happen. There's no way such a 'magic treadmill' could ever be constructed, or work. The only way to truly test a true negation of forward movement would be to chain the plane to a wall, but it really wouldn't be much of an experiment, then, would it? :)


    In fact, There seems little point to even trying this thing out. Unless this 'magic treadmill' manages to totally negate all of the plane's forward motion, the plane WILL take off, no question about it.

    Actually trying to 'bust this myth' is about as necessary as trying to prove that water is wet. We already know that only one of two things can happen, and we already know exactly why either result would happen.
     
  11. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    You wouldn't even need the "magic" treadmill. You could set the treadmill to go twice as fast as the plan top ground speed of the plane. The plane would still move forward, create lift, and take off.
     
  12. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841

    A lot of myths that are tested on the show are pretty obvious in their conclusions before even being tested, but it's still fun to watch them prove/bust it.
     
  13. Franchise3

    Franchise3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    30
    See Cannonball's response right under yours. Wouldn't the plane be able to move regardless of how fast the treadmill is moving?
     
  14. Franchise3

    Franchise3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    30
    Did you ever see the episode where they tested if you could be shot by a bullet if you were underwater? Awesome episode, imo.
     
  15. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841

    You know I think I've seen just about every single episode, multiple times...def a good one, especially when they went up to the big boy guns.
     
  16. Franchise3

    Franchise3 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2000
    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    30
    Yeah, that experiment blew my mind, especially considering that shooting at someone under water is in a ton of action movies.
     
  17. Falcons Talon

    Falcons Talon Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,807
    Likes Received:
    945
    Magic treadmill? Who needs a magic treadmill.

    Let's put this baby to bed.

    All you need is a regular treadmill, a "vehicle" with free rolling wheels and a propulsion system on top of the vehicle that can "simulate" thrust provided by the jet engine...in this case, an engine that uses with a wheel resting on a tethered rope to provide thrust from the friction. It coule be a chain and sprocket...it doesn't matter.

    Set the "jet engine" to 1 mph and set the treadmill to 1 mph in the opposite direction.

    If the "plane" moves forward at one mph, bump it up another until you realize that the plane will take off.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. JunkyardDwg

    JunkyardDwg Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    841
  19. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    Yeah, I saw it on the previews. It's supposed to air on the 30th, two weeks from tonight. They said it was never supposed to air during the "airplane hour" but due to a mistake, whoever wrote the episode synopsis said that it was. But never fear, the segment WILL air in two weeks.
     
  20. gifford1967

    gifford1967 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    8,306
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    Woohooo! There will be a feast of crow on January 30th.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now