911 Plot Uncovered?

Perhaps you could give us a more detailed description of just what it is you want us to view, daNasty.

 

Thanks for the additional info. I can tell you right off the bat that I have not doubt whatsoever that the WTC buildings were brought down by those 2 jets. As far as the Pentagon goes, I've heard some mention, here and there... and I thought here, that there was supposedly no evidence of an airliner strike, but I'm extremely (and that's putting it mildly) skeptical that it was anything else. When I have time, I'll check out your links. Thanks again for adding to what you posted.

 

This rumor has been floating around since the crash. I've seen it discussed on other message boards, and while I've never given it very serious consideration, I believe they HAVE found the black box from the plan that hit the Pentagon. That's pretty conclusive.

Also, there's the issue of where the missing plane went if it didn't hit the Pentagon...

 

I can't believe I'm even asking this question, but...

If you're going to fly a jet liner filled with enough fuel for a trip across the country into a building, why would you bother to attach a missle pod on to the plane, and then fire it a fraction of a millisecond before you hit the building?

There's only one thing that leads me to believe this conspiracy theory is basically warmed over, fly infested cow poop....it's called common sense.

 

Yes, they are bought down by those two planes, but only by these 2 planes? You need to watch that video.

 

The one thing I never understood was that they had trouble finding a blackbox at the pennsylvania crash site, but they found Saudi Passports, and a letter. ???

 

The only plot on 9/11 was the one that was carried out by Al-Qaeda.

Four planes were hijacked.

Two were flown into the World Trade Center Towers.

One was flown into the Pentagon.

One was brought down by it's passengers in Pennsylvania.

There is no cover-up, there were no cruise missiles - there is no evidence to the contrary - those sites selectively pick the facts which are easiest to skew to their benifit and then ignore the ones they can't.

 

With the criteria we Americans typically use to consider the passage of time (see the Chinese for an example of the complete opposite), it has been awhile now since I watched the second plane hit the WTC, and sat or stood, it being difficult to stay in one place, glued to the TV as the events played out.

Since then, I have read, watched, and listened to the explanations of the sequence of events that brought those towers down. I have come across nothing, nothing, that would cause me to doubt that it was a catastrophic faliure of the internal steel structure, stressed beyond anyone's imagination who was involved in it's design process prior to construction, because the idea that two commercial jetliners filled with fuel being deliberately flown into them by madmen never occured to anyone.

It was tragic, and the reasons behind that occurrence, and what might possibly have been done to prevent it, are quite enough to occupy someone who has an interest. I'm not conflicted about what happened on 9/11 because, as far as those 2 towers are concerned, I am totally convinced. I'm willing to admit not knowing as much about the Pentagon attack, but I'm more puzzled as to why we were unable to shoot that jetliner down, than I am about any theory that may be circulating about alternative possibilities.

I think an examination of what the Bush Administration could have done, given the warnings passed along by the Clinton Administration during the transition, or better put, what they didn't do, is of more interest. As is the actions taken, and not taken, by the Clinton Administration. And we have discussed that here to some length, several times. As has the 9/11 Commission, despite the President and the Republican Leadership fighting it's creation, tooth and nail, until it was clear that the bad publicity was killing the Administration. Now they pretend that they were never against it. Politics of the lowest kind, considering what we're talking about... 9/11, and why it occured.

I'm just not seeing "black helicopters" in the WTC attack, or the Pentagon attack.

Oh, and adeelsiddiqui, it is not at all uncommon for a variety of things to survive, or not survive, a catastrophic plane crash. Sometimes, people do, and there is no logical explanation for it. That's just the way it is.

 

But Paper? one of the most flammable material, but a box of steel cant survive. I just find that odd.

 

The only thing mysterious about what was shown in the film was the events around the Pentagon. But that being said, I haven't seen many things about that crash and studies of it in regards to the structure of the Pentagon. I know from reports that the section of the Pentagon hit had been reinforced.

Now the planes hitting the towers have been shown to have had enough fuel and force to bring down the towers on their own. The fires that burned causing structural failure. The towers did not collapse the same way, but collapse due to the type of damage done by where the planes hit each tower.

I don't know much about building #7's collapse. Probably the first time I even saw the events.

Now the big question, like the man said, where are the planes? If these were not passenger airliners, then what happened to the people aboard those flights? Refresh my memory, but weren't there people onboard who were on cellphones that reported flying over New York City? What about cellphone calls from the plane that hit the Pentagon? I am well familar with the calls from the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.

What this film is suggesting is a "huge" conspiracy. In this day and age of media coverage, I would think someone would talk. For all these events to have happened a lot of people would have to be involved. What about air traffic controllers tracking the planes? Who planted the bombs (explosives) in the buildings? Where did the passenger planes go?

As far as Bush's comment about seeing the plane, well nothing surprises me anymore about what comes out of his mouth. I chalk that up to just him being George.

 

Listen... I have a good friend, one of my best friends from college - now a military contractor, once in mil intel - that saw the shadow of the plane pass over his office, just across the Potomac from the Pentagon, then he looked over out of his window after hearing the concussion of the blast, realized it was a plane crash, and witnessed the wreckage and building burning, and the smoke from it for hours.

He works for a ".mil" contractor, with Grumman...

It's same deal as with the towers... all the fuel from the plane, enough to cross the continent, was hot enough while burning to melt the plane and wreckage down to mere puddles of liquid metal.

There was no cover up of the wreck... perhaps the secrets of the Pentagon's vulnerabilty (in hopes of discouraging more attacks of the like), but not the crash.

Please cut the crap.

 

But passports and letters were found?

 

As much as I would like to believe this, I still ponder why there were no plane remnants found at the Pentagon.