Just wanna know if you think these are fair and equitable fantasy trades, or if someones getting buttraped. Figuratively speaking of course. Yao 4 Boozer ------ R. Jefferson 4 R.Wallace
yao for boozer, seems pretty fair, boozer have higher FG%, FGM, steals, while yao have higher FT%, FTM, and blocks. off course who ever is getting boozer seems to be getting a bit sweeter deal as boozer also have slightly higher rebounds and slightly less TOs. richard jefferson for rasheed wallace, another relatively fair trade, wallace have lower points but more 3pointers and better 3PCT. also better rebounds, blocks, and slightly better steals. jefferson got more FGM, points, and FT%, probably shoots more FTs as well. i personally think whoever is getting wallace is getting a better deal as he avgs over 1 blk and 1 stl at the same time, while scoring decently and rebounds pretty good as well.
I agree about Boozer, but I'd rather have RJ than Sheed. It depends what you need, SF players is more common than Cs so if you're low in centers in a 2 C league you might want to take Sheed. But for just plain face value I'd rather have RJ. RJs having a HOT year and I'll admit I was wrong about him. I thought he wouldn't be the same after his injury but he looks fine. If anything Sheed looks to be on the decline.
thanks for the replies just for the record I got Boozer and Sheed in those deals. Jefferson does very little other than score and im already about 500pts ahead (roto league) so I needed better all around play. 3 and blocks especially where im struggling.
