1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. Watching NBA Action
    Come join Clutch as we're watching NBA playoff action live, including KD vs. Ant and the star-studded Clippers-Mavericks matchup

    LIVE: NBA Playoffs!
    Dismiss Notice

[Environmental tragedy] 2nd train derails in 2 days, spilling oil

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by bigtexxx, Nov 9, 2015.

  1. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Trains are a vastly inferior way to carry crude oil and natural gas liquids vs. pipelines. However, trains are increasingly transporting oil as pipelines are not built. The negative environmental impact of trains carrying more and more oil doesn't get much run in the news.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/second-train-derails-in-wisconsin-spills-oil-1447023575

    Associated Press
    Updated Nov. 8, 2015 11:19 p.m. ET

    WATERTOWN, Wis.—Canadian Pacific Railway said less than 1,000 gallons of crude oil spilled after a train derailment Sunday that prompted evacuations in southeastern Wisconsin.

    Thirteen cars derailed, and 35 homes near the site were evacuated. Canadian Pacific said in a statement that one car was punctured and it leaked some oil. The company was working to determine the exact amount but estimated the spill was no more than 1,000 gallons of oil.

    Canadian Pacific said the leaking car has been sealed, the spilled oil was contained and siphoned off, and no oil reached a waterway.

    Trains are used to transport nearly 100,000 barrels of crude oil a day in the U.S., according to the Energy Information Administration.

    The derailment Sunday was the second in the state in as many days. On Saturday, a freight train derailed near Alma in western Wisconsin, spilling thousands of gallons of ethanol.

    BNSF Railway said railroad crews stopped the leaks from five tanker cars and placed containment booms along the shoreline of the Mississippi River. One tanker released an estimated 18,000 gallons of ethanol, and the other four released an estimated five to 500 gallons each.

    BNSF said crews continued Sunday to transfer ethanol from the derailed cars and to get the cars back on the tracks.

    No one was hurt. The company said it expects the tracks to return to service Monday morning.
     
  2. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
    Rejecting Keystone is a train wreck, literally and figutativy
     
  3. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    34,114
    Likes Received:
    13,515
    Doesn't sound like this was oil that would have been on Keystone anyway. Are there other rejected pipeline projects I'm not aware of?
     
  4. Rashmon

    Rashmon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2000
    Messages:
    19,249
    Likes Received:
    14,457
    You're right, it's way past time to transition away from fossil fuels.
     
  5. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    There is something like 100k barrels of Bakken oil reserves for the Keystone XL. Tar is too viscous to flow in a pipeline, so it must be cut with a lighter oil - in this case Bakken. The K-XL would definitely take a lot of that oil off train tracks but I'm sure there are some politically relevant points won by stopping the pipeline.

    For one, it boosts the investment into U.S. oil in politically relevant states like Ohio. Also, it may or may not give benefits to railroad companies who transport the oil and are competing with pipelines. And it also may be shifting the focus of refining operations to the east coast US but I really don't haven much to back that up.
     
  6. sirbaihu

    sirbaihu Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    8,517
    Likes Received:
    2,851
    Oil's on the way out.
     
  7. bnb

    bnb Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,992
    Likes Received:
    315
    This bit is spot on. Per an offline article rail shipments of oil in the US have increased from 9500 cars in 2008 to 493000 in 2014. And rail usually goes along side riverbeds.

    Doesn't mean Keystone was a 'good' pipeline, and I'm hopeful this means much more stringent environmental and safety guidelines -- but oil is moving, demand continues and pipelines are the safest means to transport it.
     
  8. JeffB

    JeffB Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    3,587
    Likes Received:
    568
    This is a another example of why we need to move away from fossil fuels.
     
  9. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    25,411
    Likes Received:
    13,283
    i hope i live to see when the world is at a point that it uses most of its energy from the sun and wind.
     
  10. nolimitnp

    nolimitnp Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    285
    SMH. While other countries are working on 2nd and 3rd generations of high speed passenger trains that are nearly completely green and simultaneously slowly replacing airplanes as the primary method for long distance transportation, we're still using fossil fuel to transport fossil fuel. Thank you conservatives for literally trying to conserve 1950.
     
  11. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
    The conservatives don't want to use trains. They want to use pipelines.

    As far as passenger trains they would be nice but what cities would you connect?
     
  12. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    85,555
    Likes Received:
    83,891
    I love certain peoples' very, very selective definition of an "environmental tragedy"
     
  13. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    Passenger trains only work in dense corridors. Like the Northeast US, Japan, and parts of Europe.

    I've worked extensively in Europe and nobody would consider taking a train from say Paris to Moscow unless you're a broke hostel student traveler. I wouldn't say they're replacing air travel at all.
     
  14. The Boz

    The Boz Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    56
    My thoughts exactly. I work for a full service environmental company in the Houston area. Although the official numbers on gallons spilled is always much less than accurate, those numbers do not equal an "environmental tragedy".
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now