2017 First order of business for House: Impeach Clinton

I think we'd all rather have Tim Kaine as President anyway. Drops all the Clinton backage and all the political capital expended to impeach would be non-existent to stop Supreme Court appointees, potentially three or four. That's a win-win there. Go for it Republicans!

 

Might've been good if they got it done. They would have done one thing right after this disastrous election cycle, even if it wasn't their intention to help Americans. She has obviously lied under oath several times and she is just a terrible option. But surprise, Clinton made sure to pick a VP that can't tie his own shoe laces. Someone no one wants to see having any sort of important responsibilities other than sounding and looking like a bad stereotype of America.

They're just going to waste your hard earned money bickering about it, and then the dems will waste your hard earned money entertaining the threat for too long. This is all wasted time and money that they say they don't have to do their f'ing jobs and help Americans improve their standard of living for the first time in 40 f'ing years. When time comes to screw you or some brown people again, these people will all be giving each other BJ's and it will happen so swiftly, so seamlessly that you won't even notice it. Until they bring up abortion for the 100th millionth time again.

I wish corporate and government employees could spend half their time making personal attacks and conjuring up silly "aha!" moments until it came time to screw the owner. That would be nice huh. What a joke, from both sides.

 

If they do try to impeach her, Republican party is a bigger joke than I thought.

 

You know who has a tired game?

Your massive loser of a candidate:

Trump.

 

Please impeach Clinton, Republicans. I beg you.

 

I'm really warming to the idea. I really don't like Clinton anyway, but don't really have any problem with Kaine. He'd have had no chance to win on his own, but if he could ride Clinton's coattails to the VP, and then succeed her as president, that seems like a much better option than suffering a Clinton or Trump (or even Pence) Administration.

 

This. So much this.

 

I'd take Kaine over Trump and her.

 

You are incredibly lame. You are the forum's Pee Wee Fisher with your constant borrowing of Paul Reuben's "I know you are but what am I" schtick.

 

Nah son, incredibly lame is being the kind of internet clownshow who runs around posting wack-job HIllary Derangement Syndrome conspiracy theories and expecting anybody to take you seriously, then getting visibly upset at the mere mention of the name of your chosen candidate:

Trump.

 

I guess the right is just not interested in ever legislating ever again.

Eight years of obstructionism against Obama, which we hoped was just a racism thing, but now the signs are already showing that they will do the same to Clinton.

These people are a cancer to our society, and this is coming from a moderate.

 

Because country over party. Not that Democrats are saints but at least they don't waste tax dollars on investigations that lead to nowhere or intentionally try to block the legislative process because their guy didn't win.

 

Exactly how does someone get "visibly" upset on the internet? I have said I'm not voting for Trump and that I would vote for Biden or Kaine if that were a choice.

I'm not sure why you'd say that no one is taking me seriously when many people agree with me on the majority of what I wrote. Sure it's primarily split down party lines, I get that. To you, anybody is only people who agree with you.

What's interesting with you, is that I have noticed a trend where a lot of people who agree with you don't really care for your internet character or to borrow your phrase your clown-show. It's funny to watch you act like this intellectually superior guy shouting down posters because of what you perceive as their inferior educational background and then you post this jr. high level over and over "Trump" thing.

So what's worse here... A relatively young high school grad making his views known and trying to defend them as best he can or you a sad little lonely guy running around telling everyone how smart he is yet posts dumb one word answers like Trump.

Defend your candidate. There's more to come out so you will be busy. You can just continue to be lazy and think the world's laughing with you and not at you. Look, I don't agree with the people who are defending Clinton but I respect them for trying. She doesn't suck as bad as Trump is such a pathetic attempt from a man who thinks he's brilliant.

As far as Hillary, if I thought she was sincere and trustworthy, I'd vote for her solely for this, http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-autism-proposal-217353

 

This is great news for Bob Dole.

 

What is tiring to see from the conservatives is like Shaq calling Dwight a bad player because he can't shoot free throws.

 

Hmm... while I don't think even the current republican leadership would stomach any plan to attempt to impeach an overwhelming winner and disenfranchise so many Americans in the process, but if they were to cook up such a plot, its a shame they just can't temporarily put the 22nd Amendment on hold, have Obama continue for one more term, and hold another election in four years (conceivably with Warren, Gillibrand, Booker, and Castro have at it).

I know, won't ever happen, but neither will impeachment...

 

Yet Democrats are doing the exact same things. That's the problem here. We have 2 terrible candidates.

 

Already planning their next hissy fit.

The hissy fit they threw after Obama was elected got us the tea party. The tea party got us Trumpf. Trumpf got us (or will certainly get us) another lost presidential election.

Seems like a great idea!

 

If she wins, it won't be because people overwhelmingly wanted her. It would be because they didn't want Trump and his big mouth. You have no idea what is to come out next on her. I'm sure they are saving the worst for right before the election.

 

Like this:

Spoiler