1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Supreme Court packing.

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Astrodome, Oct 10, 2020.

?

Are you in favor of adding 2 more justices?

  1. Yes.

    39 vote(s)
    51.3%
  2. No.

    31 vote(s)
    40.8%
  3. Not sure.

    6 vote(s)
    7.9%
  1. Astrodome

    Astrodome Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    11,097
    Likes Received:
    12,355
    Biden is on record in the past not supporting court packing but hasn't been clear lately.

    I believe biden will win the election next month so this could become reality soon.
     
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  2. larsv8

    larsv8 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,914
    15, 5 conservative, 5 liberal, 5 Independent.

    Done.

    No more presidential appointments.
     
  3. AB

    AB Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    1,587
    I voted not sure.
    Part of me thinks they should not. But I am not complete aware of pros and cons.
     
    #3 AB, Oct 10, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2020
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  4. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,570
    I am not in favor of adding 2 more justices. I am in favor of adding 12 more justices.

    No justices, no peace.
     
    rocketsjudoka and Air Langhi like this.
  5. FranchiseBlade

    FranchiseBlade Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    48,812
    Likes Received:
    17,434
    Nope. Don't add justices. It will just keep going.

    Unless the Republicans change their current tactics they will be the first to do it as soon as they get a chance if the Democrats don't. After that each party will do it.
     
    rocketsjudoka and Astrodome like this.
  6. Amiga

    Amiga 10 years ago...
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    21,808
    Likes Received:
    18,599
    The GOP unpack the fed courts. I’m all for undoing that.
     
    edwardc and FranchiseBlade like this.
  7. dmoneybangbang

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    20,997
    Likes Received:
    12,867
    It is what it is. Conservatives packed the courts so why shouldn’t the Dems?
     
  8. Amiga

    Amiga 10 years ago...
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    21,808
    Likes Received:
    18,599
    The SC nomination and confirmation process is too extreme and partisan.

    It needs reform. Term limits and yes, more justices. 15 or whatever. I don’t care as long as it is reformed to be a much less non partisan process.

    I’m not for packing without reform.
     
  9. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    28,428
    Likes Received:
    43,595
    Depends on what happens with RBG’s vacancy, a 2 to 1 republican ratio has disastrous potential.

    With the way Garland was blocked, if Barrett gets pushed through, then tradition and decorum goes out the window, go ahead pack the courts.

    If the seat is left vacant, and Trump wins and fills it, then fair. If it’s left vacant, Biden wins and fills it, then fair.
     
    Dubious, Rashmon, mdrowe00 and 3 others like this.
  10. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    85,500
    Likes Received:
    83,773
    This.

    And there should be a mandatory retirement age.
     
  11. Hakeemtheking

    Hakeemtheking Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    9,193
    Likes Received:
    6,059
    Pack the courts. More justices deciding issues may result in better decided opinions.

    While you are at it, get rid of the electoral college. It's an antiquated system, not reflective of the will of the people.
     
  12. durvasa

    durvasa Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    37,973
    Likes Received:
    15,447
    Why not just require a higher threshold of congressional votes for nominee to be confirmed? Each side taking sides appointing partisan judges is not how it’s supposed to work.
     
  13. DVauthrin

    DVauthrin Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 1999
    Messages:
    9,186
    Likes Received:
    7,161
    Term limits should be instituted for every Supreme Court Justice, and the same should be done for Senators and members of the House of Representatives. Justices shouldn’t get to serve for their entire lifetime, and nobody should have the opportunity to spend 35 years in the Senate like Mitch McConnell has.
     
  14. Two Sandwiches

    Two Sandwiches Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    22,574
    Likes Received:
    14,128
    I'm in favor of them not approving a Justice a month before an election.

    I don't think I want to expand the court just to expand, but if we're hurrying to pack a Republican in there, election results be damned, I'd live with the Dems adding seats.

    I'd also be open to term limits.
     
  15. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    15,034
    Likes Received:
    6,206
    Simple solution.
    Increase the courts to 15.
    Every year on Feb 1st, a president can nominate a new SCJ. Once appointed, the oldest SCJ has to retire.

    When there is a case, each side gets to pick minimum of 3 justices to exclude for each case. Each justice takes turns to be mandatory on a case so there is not an even ruling. This way the extremists get eliminated from cases.
     
  16. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    15,034
    Likes Received:
    6,206
    My interpretation is Biden is getting tired of answering that question as its alienating him further from his base. This is a tactic Trump used in the debates... alienate moderate Biden from the extreme leftist.
     
  17. larsv8

    larsv8 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,914
    How does that fix the current issue of hyper partisan Court?

    Kavanagh and Barret should never be on a supreme court.
     
  18. Amiga

    Amiga 10 years ago...
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    21,808
    Likes Received:
    18,599
    If that works to make it less partisan, sure. But I doubt that’s enough. Each party will deny any nomination to be confirmed until they have enough votes on their own. Remember the GOP suggested they would unpack and leave the court at 8 and never allow a confirmation if Clinton won.
     
    #18 Amiga, Oct 10, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2020
    FranchiseBlade likes this.
  19. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,729
    Likes Received:
    3,477
    because then you need bipartisan agreement.
     
    Corrosion likes this.
  20. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    Not only yes but hell yes. It’s time for Republicans to experience might makes right on the other foot. Add six of the youngest, most liberal justices you can find and then try to make it illegal to add any more. Then run up a bunch of cases to overturn Citizens United. Time for the pendulum to to swing back, a lot.

    Also, make it a law that the President will have a vote on any new justice when an opening comes about. No more stealing justices Mitch McConnell bull****.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now