This deal won't turn out like the NK deal because Iran is not NK. However, it's easy to be lazy and say they are the exact same.
And by that, he's predicting that a legendarily ****ty Republican president named Bush will allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons and not be able to do anything about it. Sweet.
Who's confused? Bush 41 advised against destabilizing Iraq, but Bush 43 went ahead and did it anyway. I supported Bush 43 during those years, but I have since recanted his Iraq decision to topple Saddam Hussein. That is public record. What our closet Muslim president has done with his blind trust of a sworn enemy (ours, apparently not his) is to guarantee nuclear war in the Mideast. My proposed solution will not prevent the coming holocaust but it may forestall it long enough for us to prepare. The grim reality is that we will never fully recover from Obama's foreign and domestic travesties.
I am far more satisfied with my post than I am with Obama's blind faith that the Iranians will suddenly comply with Obama's hope and dream that Iran will become responsible in furthering world peace. If you believe in Obama, you, Baba, are the one who is disoriented.
You say our president is a Muslim. He is not. You then say that the only solution is to give nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia. WHAT?! You are delusional, disoriented and dangerous. Thank the gods that you aren't in charge of anything.
and all the experts who say this is a good deal. That doesn't matter. Let's keep the focus solely on Obama and demonize him as much as possible. Pretend as if this was his personal, direct negotiation with Iran and it's so much easier to generate passion and doubt.
There's no spin at all; Republican bluster on foreign policy writes its own punchline. There's really not much ground between the two parties on most foreign policy issues other than chicken sh-t rhetoric and empty threats, and the time there was (iraq) was a spectacular, legendary failure.
This a suspicious suggestion. How are we supposed to know that you are not in fact a super secret Muslim yourself?
Let's just end the debate for now and revisit the topic in a few years (if it takes that long) after Iran has tested their first nuke. There's really nothing to debate here anyway, the screw up has been made and there's really no way of fixing it.
A few more years of jopathology- that is a thought far more horrible to contemplate than nuclear annihilation.
Not just b/c they are different. The deals aren't comparable. Another non-sense commonly spilled from lack of any knowledge or knowing. NK deal doesn't remotely come close to a single paragraph of the Iran deal. You can't even call NK deal a deal. That's how horrible it was.
For one difference, NK is an small, isolated, closed society that survives on blackmail and Iran is a larger, more sophisticated population with a diverse economy that depends on world trade for their desired prosperity. so, not the same
You are such a continuous hard sucker of weak source. Of course, it makes total sense that it doesn't ever matter what IAEA said to a rock. Reminded me of the time you were 100% convinced that Syria would never give up it's chemical weapon stockpiles. Next time, think before swallowing.
