With that kind of impulse control, or lack of, it's no wonder he has an entire stable of b*stard kids.
<iframe src="https://vine.co/v/ebBrXMQQWDq/embed/simple" width="600" height="600" frameborder="0"></iframe><script src="https://platform.vine.co/static/scripts/embed.js"></script>
I disagree. That wasn't a punch. It was a backhand to clear the man off his back that was clearly fouling him. It could have just as easily hit him in the chest. No way Dwight was trying to hit him in the face/head. Flagrant 1 is all that is warranted. Although you never know with the NBA since they suck all of the Warriors D's.
This is just a dumb comment. That wasn't even an elbow, he got him with the forearm and not with a lot of force. Give me a break.
JR Smith just got 2 games for a similar play. Look, I don't want him suspended, but I think he should be. DD
it probably should have been a technical not a flagrant, tbh it works in our favor that they did call it a flagrant 1
I don't think that's a flagrant 2. At all. It was a little slap & typically they'd call that a technical. Though, I wouldn't be surprised if they upgrade it w/ the way they've been calling things. Either way, Dwight is due for a suspension soon w/ his playoff technicals/flagrants. I really hope it's not upgraded. I think its in everyone's (including the league's) best interest to keep the players in.
It was a mistake but when was the last time you got beat on over and over again without penalty? Van Gundy was completely correct, they expect players to have no emotion and sometimes you can't help it.
I hope that is the case. The responder shouldn't be ejected...and Bogut was doing that on purpose, just to get a reaction from Howard. Warriors are being coached to push the rules/play dirty (take your pick), and the refs and league shouldn't reward them for it.