So we are gonna ignore the riot thats happening in Baltimore

Once again, trying to speak for me. Do me a favor and don't.

Of course it has ramifications. Don't act the fool.

And to call me an outlier, take a little look in the mirror. Google can yield a lot with screen names.

Lucky I'm in a position to make an impact on these kids that come from poverty and lack of education and help them do something with themselves. It's a choice.

 

On that note. I'm done with this thread and probably D&D.

 

Unfortunately some of what you say has some merit. However, when your cause of social justice infringes on another individuals natural rights to life or property, your cause looses plenty of sympathy.

 

Thanks Clutch. I know usually anything goes in the D&D but this thread is getting out of hand...

And nice work Teen Wolf. Nice work indeed.

 

I know, if we could only all just follow your example of civility...

 

Wait... what?

Did you just google me? Did my comments irk you THAT much?

 

Wow... so you believe that raising kids properly would address the belief that the law enforcement and justice systems don't work for those in Baltimore (and across the country)?

I think this highlights why there is a problem...

 

Can't endorse violence and looting, sorry. Will point this out, however:

 

I mean, how can a message board be civilized with so many commie traitors?

 

Yeah treeman, you have been pretty vile in this thread yourself. You can disagree with me all you want, but I haven't engaged in any personal attacks and insults, and I can not say the same for you and many others who I seem to have upset.

At least you have the guts to not do it anonymously though, I'll give you that.

 

Oh I know I'm not terribly respectful to the lefties here. They don;t deserve it in my eyes. But you won't see me repping them just so I can wish them death.

 

Yes, there would have been a DOJ report no matter what. The ignorant morons who burned that town because a cop defended himself against a criminal who was attacking him did nothing positive.....then again you've made it clear on multiple occasions that you look up to criminals so your opinion on the matter isn't shocking.

BTW, rioting and looting in order to scare the population into political change is by definition terrorism.....just so you know what you are supporting.

 

Most countries are going to think that about America anyway I was mainly talking about your views about segregation I do talk to older Black men and women all the time thats way i have a open mind when it comes to issues like this as for Sharpton and Jackson there just talk.

 

I see no difference (although one group is inspired by racial hatred, while the other is basically a bunch of drunk morons). The treatment should be the same - arrest and prosecution for the lot of them.

 

this is like the worst strawman, no one sane has ever called peaceful protesters animals or thugs

no one sane has also dismissed other riots as just "rowdy". Source I'm from Vancouver, majority of people ****ing hated the few thugs that destroyed a community they don't even live in.

by the way the hockey riot wasn't about hockey, most of the people doing the damage were not even hockey fans. The ones doing the vandalizing just needed a reason to act like drunken morons and destroy properties in an area they don't even live in.

 

Explain to me why Indian males are pretending to be black so they have more educational opportunities?

http://www.celebritydirt.com/mindy-kaling-disowns-brother-who-posed-as-black-to-get-into-med-school/

 

Vile? Calling you out on your advocacy of violence and your racism is vile? If that's vile, then I am surely one vile SOB.

You NEED to be called out on this. You're a racist, and you are condoning violence in the name of racial hatred. You're no better than a Klan member.

 

Because that one particular Indian male is a ****bag?

Oh, I see. You assume that 40 years of affirmative action can make up for 400 years of unequal educational opportunities.

 

I don't think it is that clear cut -- and I mean that from both sides.

Rioters and looters often do things that I disagree with in particular, but, we have to remember that the government uses systematic violence and coercion to prevent millions of people in this country from an equal chance at life and property. I don't fault people for being violently angry about the seeming unwillingness of their government and society to listen to their anger over these conditions, and I have come to think that violence may be the only way to change anything with a government as resistant to change as ours is.

I would prefer violence not be the only option for change, but all evidence seems to point to that being the case.

 

Sure I did. Not irked at all. Just curious to see how you deeply you relate to the situation being discussed.