Iran: No deal reached, only framework; Iran can still enrich

If Obama actually made important decisions such as making it a requirement for a deal that a country recognizes another country's right to exist dependent upon his personal feelings about an alleged publicity stunt, that would be sad.

 

"Personal feelings" does not equal undermining our democracy and potentially sabotaging a historic arms reduction deal.

The bottom line is Netanyahu ****ed up big time.

Regardless of that, Having Iran include a statement about Israels right to exist in this deal is about as stupid as Iran insisting that members of the U.S. government stop publicly giving sermons about bombing Iran.

 

Nope. And which member of the U.S. government are you referring to?

 

And yet you can't show it's false.

Uranium that's not enriched produces too much PU-240 to be useful. That's what is meant by weapons grade Pu. You clearly have reached your limit and are assuming all Pu is the same. I will explain it to you. PU-240 is less stable than Pu-239. It tends to emit a neutron which when you have critical mass and thus is unstable.

It's clear now why you think this is a bad deal. You don't understand. You can say something is false but you can't show why you are right. To me that only further proves my point.

 

let's give peace a chance.

 

I absolutely agree that the Rothschilds shouldn't be allowed to enrich weapons-grade nuclear material. Thanks, Obama.

That is what we're talking about, right?

 

yes because mossad (exiled and remii)

 

Is that a serious question?

 

Yes...

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UL3hbY4IbZ0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=om7d_9kj64w

 

Your own quotes say with an leu target they can still have enough material for a weapon in a year. Your own freaking links sweet tard. Lets look at some more Sweet Tard quotes.

MVP!

 

Exactly. This is one of the reasons the framework is so important. Most people in the world just see "Muslim", "Middle East" country and think they are all the same. They don't realize how monumental it would be to pull Iran into the orbit of civilized nations. This is why the U.S. shouldn't give a flipping care what the Saudis and other Sunni countries think. It also goes without saying Netanyahu has already destroyed whatever credibility he had.

The U.S. has to lead instead of being yanked around by regional allies who fear change.

 

I just skimmed the article, but I didn't see anywhere that stated exactly what he didn't like about the deal. I'd be curious to hear what his objections are.

 

Does a potential republican presidential nominee count? I'll give you one guess who it is.


"Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran"

You know, like the Beach Boys song.

 

None of these people is a member of the U.S. government?

 

my hometown's congressman is in the link he provided what's the confusion?

 

No they don't. You are just making stuff up at this point. You haven't produced a single link or source to show that low enriched uranium can produce weapons grade pu. Not one.

Because it's not possible. You searched and searched. And you couldn't find a link. So instead, you dug through the threads to find something I was wrong about in the past and than hurl insults. This is the sign of a desperate man. The one who has been defeated but can not own up to it.

I owned up to my failings. I didn't stick to a ridiculous position once I knew I was wrong. Unlike you. That's the difference between us. You're a child.

 

Whatever you say.

 

Sorry, my mistake. In German, we only call the executive branch "government". I now realize that you include the legislative branch and the judiciary in that term.

 

Yea, I'm definitely going to change my name to Richard since you like putting it in your mouth so much. Richard Clark.

Post the link showing the history of countries using nuclear bombs during war or conflict... I'll wait.