[Shocking] Police Routinely Violate Rights Of "The Blacks" in Ferguson

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>President Obama sends tweet on Ferguson shooting: 'Violence against police is unacceptable' <a href="http://t.co/IsFG2Fj3OW">http://t.co/IsFG2Fj3OW</a> <a href="http://t.co/ORn2jSnB9W">pic.twitter.com/ORn2jSnB9W</a></p>&mdash; NBC Nightly News (@NBCNightlyNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/576060808414789632">March 12, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

So you believe the shooting of policemen last night was justified?

 

You can't answer my question! You can't even admit that the cops shooting wasn't justified? Instead you choose to interject other events? Your bias cripples your ability to think clearly.

 

He did answer you (unlike you, who has been dodging questions from me for days) -- he said "no more than" and listed a bunch of the abuses by the police, abuses they do not think are justified. Thus, since the shooting of the police is "no more" justified than things not justified, they thus think the shooting is not justified either.

Their very apt point is that you condone the abuses of the people of this country by police, instead of being against abuses by either side.

 

once again you have shown your true colors you are just a true hater when it comes down to the what been going on Holder and Potus has nothing to do with it people are just fed up with the way things have been going and how some have been treated.

 

You know *am hell no one in there right would find what happen to those officers justified STOP your dam TROLLING.

 

Umm, serious? He exactly answered your question by comparing it to the same "not justified" situations.

He wrote it in a more sophisticated way. Let me explain it in terms you may better understand.

"So, was the cops shooting justified?"

"No. And neither are the civil rights violations.. And neither are.."

You see, he answered your question exactly. He simply chose to use complex rather than basic sentence structures to explain his points.

Here's my question to you: once they catch the cop shooter, he will certainly, or most likely, be tried and convicted. Very likely, this situation will be resolved.

Now, since we're saying all of these things are not justified, how should they resolve the civil rights violations and racial discrimination? Or do you conveniently not have an answer for that???

 

The Ferguson incident was a case where the protesters and the media were 100% wrong, and the police and Darren Wilson were 100% right in the argument. Instead of openly acknowledging this, and in order to save face, the media and the DOJ call the Ferguson PD racist. Awfully convenient.

 

Yes just say it - they should all be shot. All of them. All the blacks in all the poor neighborhoods. Round them up and shoot them. Because it's ok to treat them like animals they are.

 

So rather than look at the pattern which has been proven against the Ferguson PD and their justice system, you only mention one incident. You ignore the pattern of discrimination that has been going on there for years.

Actually you do worse than ignore it, you try and act like those actual facts came about because someone wanted to save face. I would think someone like you would to hold people accountable for their actions. But apparently you don't.

Why is it that you only want to hold certain people accountable for their actions and not others?

 

There is never any justification for shooting someone armed or unarmed when they are not a real legitimate treat to anyone's safety.

Never.

And the fact you can't condemn the police shootings by the tea party crowd but can condemn them with the culprits are blacks says what we all here already know.

bigracisttt

 

Hey, here's a shock... Bigtexx getting exposed. Again and again. Wow. Embarrassing.

 

When dealing with lesser educated, emotional members of any society, crowd control is a key objective of a government. Unscrupulous steps are taken, people are killed, and lies are told to control the unruly masses and prevent uprisings. With sophisticated, intellectual, and even-keeled people, this is less relevant. The collateral damage in this incident is the police chief and the reputation of the police force in Ferguson. These are the sacrifices to maintain order. If you don't think this happens, then frankly, you don't know much about how governments truly work.

 

If government inherently acts in this manner, then why should we have it? If it does not act in such a way that is in the interest of the lives of the communities they rule, then why should the people in those communities support it?

The people of Ferguson have been targeted, abused and exploited by their government -- and the same is true for a large amount of people all over this country. Since the government is not serving our interests, why should we be loyal to it?

 

One reason why we have government to protect these types of people from themselves. Left to their own devices, their micro-society would descend into chaos. There are certain groups where this is the case -- mainly Democratic constituents. This is the fundamental divide between Republicans and Democrats today which enters into so many policy debates. Republicans believe in free will, independence, and little government intervention into society. That's fine for their base -- people who can provide for themselves and stay out of trouble. Democrats believe in government control and government knows best for its people. Frankly, for a good chunk of Democratic voters, this is the right form of governance. Certain groups of society are just not self sufficient and probably won't be within our lifetimes -- they depend on government to live and Democrats depend on them for their votes. It works politically.

 

Right, republicans believe that you have to herd the blacks into ghettos and police them heavily to keep them controlled and away from the rich white people. Thanks for explaining your POV

 

Quite the contrary. You have the typical lefties making every excuse for shooting policemen. They need to take a step back and recognize how poor logic that is.