1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

True or False statement regarding Christians and Muslims in the United States

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by fchowd0311, Feb 19, 2015.

?

True or False: Christian theocracy is a more imminent threat to American democracy than Sharia Law.

  1. True

    56 vote(s)
    61.5%
  2. False

    35 vote(s)
    38.5%
  1. HamJam

    HamJam Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,615
    Likes Received:
    560
    I am not going to go one by one through the list of all the people that signed the deceleration of independence, but I will recommend a book to you which argues quite convincingly that the founding fathers with the most influence into the nature of our government (Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Hamilton, Franklin, Washington etc) were indeed not Christians. That book is titles The Religious Beliefs of America's Founders: Reason, Revelation, and Revolution
     
  2. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    I'm glad that they influenced the nature of our government because they showed a great deal of wisdom in keeping religion separate from the rule of law but this nation was founded by Christians and a whole lot of them died doing it. IMO it is you that are living with a false view of history.

    I would love to talk religion with any one of those men because I know that whatever view they have of God it would be one that they built and not one that they got from somebody else. That is something I can appreciate.
     
  3. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    Demographics don't dictate TYPE of government or state. You seem to be missing that point entirely.
    Another concept you have a difficulty understanding: An individual or group's intent or motivation can be ENTIRELY independent from their religion.
     
    #123 fchowd0311, Feb 23, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2015
  4. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,238
    Having a population that identifies itself as Christian and being a model Christian nation are two different things. I do not have an issue with the United States having a majority that identifies as Christian... However this idea that the USA embodies model Christian virtue is just not reflected in our history. The USA is and has been about expansionism, individuality, financial prosperity and wide spread consumption of resources. I am not even judgmental of it, I believe that is what happens.. To the winner goes the spoils in reality.
     
  5. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,238
    Franklin attended church and donated to Christian churches but admittedly had little use for religion or scripture. He was not a religious man. Jefferson enjoyed the study of Christianity and at various times praised it and criticized it, but was not a Christian. Washington was less bold than others on religion, and did find value in Christian writings and teachings, he was greatly influenced by Jesuits. He clearly believed in a creator but didn't articulate a Christian idea of God. Hamilton wasn't from America but was actually the most inline with a real vision of America. He attended church off and on but has made remarks about religion being unnecessary.

    John Adams was a Christian IMO. He strongly believed in God and although, had Deist ideas popular at the time ultimately was a Christian. However even Adams was a firm believer in the seperation of Church and State. Hell, term "creator" was an abstraction/philosophy that was used to support the idea of rights at birth and also was a compromise term.
     
  6. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,223
    Likes Received:
    39,721
    WTF kind of question is this? They are both ****ing terrible things to have in government.

    Are you asking which one SUCKS less?

    THEY BOTH SUCK !

    DD
     
  7. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    I actually have not missed either of those points and have in fact acknowledged both of them here. I would like to point out that freedom of religion was a major motivation and the people who were concerned about this wanted the freedom to practice Christianity(whatever flavor they wanted) without interference from the government. In fact, this was one of the main reasons people came to the colonies.

    I'm trying to stay on point with the OP's question. This is a country of Christians and always has been. I don't see how the prevailing religious belief system for over 200 years can be more "dangerous" to our country than a different one which for the most part has proven to be totally intolerant of other religions.
     
  8. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    Again, I have no idea what you mean by "model Christian nation"? We are a nation of Christians but if any nation were to model itself after Christ, the rest of the nations would crush that nation. I don't know how you crucify a nation but that whatever end that nation came to would approximate that.
     
  9. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    The intent of the Puritans and the intent of the founding fathers are separated by 100+ years. The Puritans have a drastically different take on Christianity than the founding fathers. Do you know ANYTHING about Puritan ideology? They were the fundamentalists of their time and had some rather draconian belief systems.

    And I never stated one ideology to be "more dangerous' than the other. I stated explicitly that one is RELATIVELY more imminent or more "likely" than the other. And my entire point is a response to SEVERAL state legislators that are wasting time creating legislation to "combat Sharia Law". I am exemplifying the cognitive dissonance amongst those state legislatures. Stop straw-manning my position.
     
    #129 fchowd0311, Feb 24, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2015
  10. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199

    Huh?

    Ok then, if your position is that Christianity, which has been the ever present dominant religion in this country for over 200 years is an imminent threat then I'm really not sure you understand what imminent might mean.

    I'll try not to straw man your positions in the future.
     
  11. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,238
    The United States does not reflect Christian ideals.

    It is that simple.
     
  12. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    60,002
    Likes Received:
    133,238
    Not all Christians are created equal, and the values shared, the goals and priorities are vastly different. Fundamentalist Christians are a far cry from the garden variety Catholic or Protestant citizen that goes to Church 4-5 times a year and believes in a seperation of Church and State.

    There are Christian Fundamentalists that will openly admit they want to do away with the separation of Church and State, codify Biblical law and take other steps.

    Your reasoning is flawed. Look at it like this, which is a greater threat to Syria, Christian extremists or Islamic extremists? The answer is Islamic extremists.

    Fundamentalists that wish to greatly influence or destroy our way of life are dangerous.
     
  13. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    I know, those damn liberals scare me too..
     
  14. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    Christian theocracy is to Muslim theocracy as auto travel is to air travel. You'll get in a lot more wrecks with a crazy Christian, but once Muslim theocracy runs out of gas you and everyone around you will fall out of the air and ****ing die.
     
  15. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,920
    Likes Received:
    39,925
    I remain unconvinced that you have ever made a post of any worthwhile substance in this subsection. I'm not sure what you considered gained with your random drop ins to say something so useless.
     
  16. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    You just did it again. Did I ever state that the threat of Christian theocracy is 'imminent'? If you actually read all my posts in this thread I explicitly state "relative" before 'imminent' and each time I referred to 'imminent' relative to Sharia Law, and my entire point was to show the cognitive dissonance of several state legislators wasting their time creating and passing bills that "outlaw sharia law'.
     
  17. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    Here in your poll question...

    View Poll Results: True or False: Christian theocracy is a more imminent threat to American democracy than Sharia Law.
     
  18. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    .... "more imminent" "than Sharia Law".
     
  19. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    Ok, neither is imminent at all.

    The fact that we have lived with the threat of Christianity for 200+ years lends me to believe that Sharia might be MORE imminent. That and the fact that Sharia has no tolerance for other religions and that fact puts it at odds with one of the primary freedoms our country was founded on.

    Anyway, I think I have said all this already so I'm done here.
     
  20. fchowd0311

    fchowd0311 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    55,682
    Likes Received:
    43,473
    2/5ths of the core principles in Christianity, the Ten Commandments, propagate the notion of victimless crimes. I believe those are just as "at odds with of the the primary freedoms our country was founded on."
     

Share This Page