1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Can the government force people to buy anything?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by bmd, Mar 28, 2014.

  1. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    That was a tax for sailors only. Not the whole country.

    But I'm not sure about the source anyway. It's one historians opinion. It's far from fact. Historians disagree all the time.
     
  2. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Congratulations.
     
  3. Major

    Major Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 1999
    Messages:
    41,683
    Likes Received:
    16,209
    As noted earlier, the Militia Act of 1792 required all able-bodied men to buy guns and ammo. What does "sailors only" matter anyway? Is there a certain number of people that it's OK to force to buy something? What is that number? Besides, the health care law doesn't require everyone to buy to anything. Only adults that don't have health insurance elsewhere and aren't poor or exempt in other ways. It's a far smaller population than "able-bodied men".
     
  4. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,809
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    There was in fact a law passed and signed by John Adams so that's a fact. When you find historians that disagree about Jefferson, and the others then that's a valid point. The story was from Fobres which is hardly a liberal bastion.

    From the thread title I thought the discussion was about the issue of the govt. forcing people to buy things. The govt. in fact forced people to buy insurance. The fact that it was only a segment of the population doesn't change the fact that govt. did in fact force people to buy things. And these were the founding fathers.
     
  5. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,860
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    No stupider than the premise of you starting this thread - hey the Rockets got Dwight Howard!
     
  6. bongman

    bongman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,213
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    Bottom line, it is still a requirement and that the govt. can mandate for us to buy things. The protection is there so that ALL drivers will be financially responsible just in case something bad happens. Otherwise, just like health, other people will end up paying for bills that wasn't really theirs.
     
  7. bongman

    bongman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,213
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    Except, you can't choose to not be sick or get into an accident. The premise of mandating auto insurance is no different than health.

    That is not what's driving health care costs. Expensive surgeries and maintenance drugs for things that could have prevented if they were diagnosed early is where the bulk of it is. It makes sense to give people incentive to get checked up every so often. Proactive is always much better than reactive.
     
  8. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    Requiring auto insurance is a state law. It isn't a federal law. So it really isn't even an applicable argument.
     
  9. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    So because somebody disobeyed the Constitution a long time ago that means it should be allowed today?

    And no, it is not a "far smaller population" than able-bodied men. Because it requires all men and women to have health insurance.
     
  10. Dairy Ashford

    Dairy Ashford Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,585
    Likes Received:
    1,888
    This is your thread, be an adult and respond to the arguments instead of whining that no one agrees with your fake rhetorical question.
     
  11. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    GREAT EXAMPLE WITH THE ROLEX ANALOGY
     
  12. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    I don't think you know what rhetorical means.
     
  13. Kyakko

    Kyakko Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    2,161
    Likes Received:
    39
    Like this... Do we really, really, really need another implied Obama Care thread?
     
  14. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,255
    Likes Received:
    32,972
    How long they been forcing us to buy car insurance?
    Why is this on ya mind now. . . . all of a sudden like?

    Rocket River
     
  15. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,809
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    Maybe you need to rethink how you look at the constitution. The people who passed those laws were the ones that actually wrote and put together the constitution. I think they had a more secure idea of what they meant with that document.

    Also nobody is required to buy anything. People can chose not to buy the insurance and then make a payment instead. Every individual is free to choose to do that if they wish.
     
  16. bmd

    bmd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,749
    Likes Received:
    3,531
    Even back then there were many who didn't agree with parts of the Constitution. It wasn't like they all agreed. There were huge disagreements back then just like now.

    As for your other point, you are being forced to either buy something, or pay a fine in lieu of that thing.
     
  17. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    496
    Health insurance should be required because it is a certainty that every human will use healthcare at some point. This is to protect the taxpayers who shouldn't have to pay the medical bills of someone who chooses not to carry insurance.
     
  18. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,809
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    Yes there were disagreements. Do you have any evidence to provide that the disagreements were on the acts mentioning where govt. forced citizens to buy insurance, weapons and arms?

    Even if there was information about that do you have evidence to show that the acts requiring those purchases were ultimately decided to be unconstitutional?

    The fact that there was debate about the constitution and acts of congress back then don't really change the fact that many of the fathers of the country felt fine about compelling citizens to buy things.

    And you are correct, you have the choice to buy or to pay a fine. You still aren't forced to buy something and have a choice.
     

Share This Page