Well, they ain't drafting Mack at 1.1, so you're left with taking either Watkins or one of the tackles at the top. Not exactly inspiring, but at least it would hopefully nail down the RT spot or pair someone up with Nuke after Andre hangs it up (not going to happen). I'd still prefer Clowney, but I have concerns about his position in a 3-4. He has no experience at OLB, and would need to bulk back up to play an Antoine Smith-sized DE.
^ asterisk -- against AAC defenses makes the SEC guys look better, and takes Bridgewater and Bortles down a bit
the numbers for Bortles are skewed even because of the amount of screen passes he throws. Hard to overthrow a screen.
Why does everyone look at the SEC as some sort of powerhouse juggernaut conference? Sure they have their top programs like LSU, Alabama, and now Texas A&M but its not like they only play each other. (I didn't include Florida because Teddy beat Florida and they're nobodies so if all of a sudden they are considered top programs that would contradict you alls argument) They still have their bottom dwelling teams like all the other confrences.
No, not really. Bottom teams; Vandy, Kentucky, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Arkansas, Tennessee. All of these schools are cupcakes compared to the top dogs of the conference. I left out Auburn, they just made it back to the top within the last 5 years.
The fact that Ole Miss is a dog compared to the better teams in the SEC is telling of how ****ing good the SEC is.
Ole Miss has always been a dog. Even when Eli was there they weren't world beaters. People keep putting the p***y on a pedestal.
Of those "dogs" you listed, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt, and Arkansas have all reached the top 25 in the last 3 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PDxsAwpM2YE Impressive, very impressive No doubt rustled BOB jimmy as well
Yeah because reaching the top 25 means you're a national powerhouse. Texas has reached the top 25 the last 3 years as well. They still sucked by the end of it all.
