Actually really like that.....he is a good scorer and I would rather have a good backup shooter/scorer at the wing than a pg with the current roster.
My thoughts exactly. Why would you trade away a point guard for a small forward? This is getting very interesting. Of course, this could also be a "only thing that was available at the time".
A little. If you take the Lowe definition of a 3 and D...able to hit 3 pointers at high rate and efficiency, guard 2s, and guard 3s, he is not a 3 and D. He can't guard 2s. 3s, he is okay guarding.
Looks like a poorman's black chandler parsons. We needed some depth there though, so i guess that's alright.