You can do it, but i would go traditional, unless you had a yao type center. But still it would seem less favorable than having a traditional pf
Yeah, basically a mix of everything. To me it's not an intuitive way to rank players. It doesn't say who's better or who's greater. It's more like "if players A and B met, which one would have more to brag about."
Barry-Rodman-Hakeem. Like my FC thus far, great defense, good passing, rebounding and offense. Should be good for transition and half court.
Don't know, I'm going by impact in the team. All-time rebounding, defense and athleticsm. Sure, there are more accomplished guys in history, but feel like only very few with such impact, that can't be replaced by someone similar.
I don't know who's available, I haven't started planning my next pick yet. Off the top of my head, I might've gone with one of the little guys here. That said, my by far the best built all-time team lost in round 1, and my worse all-time teams all got out of round 1, as far as I remember. So my "best built" and "worse" is very different from judges' "best" and "worse".
