Drake was furious that Philip Seymour Hoffman took his 'Rolling Stone' cover

Nope. What does it matter? Dude just passed away. We're not even talking whether he "deserves it" or doesn't, just the fact that Drake is crying over what should be NOTHING. Granted, PSH was a drug addict, died of an overdose, etc., all that... nothing too 'clean' or morally right if you ask me, but it also doesn't make it right for Drake to be crying about "they ran the issue without giving me a choice to be in it or not"... WTF. Leave it alone, kid.

 

OMG WHO CARES - Peter Griffin

 

Why not? He doesn't owe him any sympathy or sensitivity.

If Rolling Stone screwed him, he has every right to be angry.

 

This is what Drake sounds like.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mWQ-GvVpus4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I can see why Rolling Stone would drop him for a druggie.

 

The self-righteous judgmental bull**** in this thread makes me ****ing sick.

 

Fine. Let him be a disrespectful person. As long as you're cool with that...

How did they "screw" him?!?!? Did they owe him any "sympathy or sensitivity"?!?!? Wha---?

You can't have it both ways or hypocritically the same way.

 

Drake is the type of guy to sit on the toilet and pee

 

He's mainly mad at the fact that the Rolling Stones misquoted him, and used "off the record" things he talked about. Drake should know though when you do these magazine interviews you gotta stay political or else if they see a possible headliner they could use, they're gonna use it.

 

Well the original tweet was deleted before his PR team wrote the statement.

Nevertheless, this incident doesn't change the fact that Drake is and will always be a bottom b****.

 

I don't consider being upset that Rolling Stone magazine dropped his promised cover in favor of a sensationalist cover of a dead druggie actor who shot up too much heroin and left his small children behind as a form of disrespect. Sorry.

Quit acting like he spit on Hoffman's grave, or that Hoffman was saint-worthy and everybody needs to stop their lives to honor his death just because Rolling Stone stuck him on their cover to sell more issues.

 

A little harsh but i cant disagree with your assessment of hoffman.

 

yup, being on cover is huge, and if they promised him cover and said he would wait for his interview to be in the next issue then so be it, but they published it anyways without his consideration.

I'm in the car scene, so I know what it's like to be on the cover of a car magazine, it's a huge honor. I haven't been on the cover but I did have the biggest spread in the issue :grin:

 

It was every bit as escapist an approach to life (and as bad an example for black youth).

 

Drake wasn't in the wrong. Shouldn't have even wasted an RIP.

 

How have you been brother? Nice post, repped.

To OP, shut the hell up. No one cares what you think

 

I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with ballet dancing. Sure , it's not my thing but how does that negate him being a good rapper or performer? It's like discrediting john Wayne for working in a nice cream store or working in the prop department.

 

One factor may be that Hoffman actually had talent.