LOL, that's the only reason I come in here. It's funny to watch him try to "discuss" this with people that actually understand all of this. I know enough to know that I don't know.
There is nothing noble in saying I'm an expert don't argue with me You came in here just to dick ride it
Just because you don't understand what's going on doesn't mean other people don't. Point out something I said that you disagree with and debate me on it. Otherwise Otis nailed your act. Not all of this has to do with the bankruptcy case. That said, I just submitted a statement that was attributed to the judge in this case that seems to differ with the opinions of some here. Not a peep on that except for one to leave with his tail between legs.
It wasn't a statement made by the judge. It was a question from the judge during examination of a witness. The only statements that are made by the judge are in the order and any findings of fact he makes on the record as part of his ruling. You are really grasping at straws. I didn't respond because trying to take that tweet and make it into a statement of fact by the judge is so abysmally stupid I didn't really think you were trying to do that.
The basic concepts of negotiating / leveraging play a huge role in all this and is something I have a lot of experience with. The way that Jim Shady has conducted himself through all this is NOT the kind of guy you want on your side of the negotiating table. Crane came in unprepared with no apparent back up plan. He has been abysmal with his customer base. He points the blame finger at his partners and accepts no responsibility for anything. He is a horrible negotiator.
I wasn't talking about you. Kneejerk much? I wasn't the only who thinks you are wrong. Did you see that?
That just mean that you and somebody else are misrepresenting what is happening in the bankruptcy court. So what?
Where exactly did Jim Crane try to pass something that was asked as a question as a statement by the judge?
Geez, you are stubborn. I posted what Crane said earlier. BTW... I e-mailed David Barron on the subject. Below is his response. I deleted my name and e-mail address. One more person who says you are wrong. Your expert status is taking a beating. Judge Isgur's ruling doesn't preclude any options. Tnx. David -----Original Message----- From: XXXXX Sent: Mon 12/2/2013 11:18 PM To: Barron, David Subject: CSN Bankruptcy Hearing FSBB_KEY: 55.11.12.21.89.25.204.7.42.3.400.29 F422CAA3BA266218461E2: 18461e2 87E6BCE5760A499DFEFA456E1E6B5: MTM4NjA0NzY2MQ== ACTION: submit RE: email SITEID: 33 SITENAME: premiumchron URL: http://www.houstonchronicle.com/author/david-barron/ OBJECT: author OBJECTID: 29 TITLE: Author FROMNAME: XXXX EMAIL: XXXX SUBJECT: CSN Bankruptcy Hearing MESSAGE: Can you tell me if Judge Isgur's ruling prohibits Jim Crane from renegotiating the terms of the CSN Houston deal with Comcast staying as partners? ======================================================== This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. ========================================================
Of course it's unlikely after the bs lawsuit. But you claimed the point of the order was to buyout one or more of the partners. You were wrong about that. The order was before the lawsuit.
This thread would be so much better if everyone would just stop feeding the trolls. Back when it was just Max and Refman discussing some of the finer points of the law going on, I was transfixed because it was all stuff I didn't know about or fully understand. I don't have any problem understanding jaded fans who will take any opportunity to fling mud at Jim Crane. I hear that every morning on sports talk radio. Just stop replying to them.
