She has no balls period, sir. She's a woman. And why does it take mental fortitude (which is what I assume you meant) to attack someone who isn't even looking for a fight? I don't advocate anything, but I approve of justice. Justice. Again, do you think she would have stopped there if he didn't do anything? Give her an inch, and she'll take a mile. I detest violence against women... violence period. But to call me a bully and a wimp just because I point out the obvious...I'm thinking you can identify with those guys gang-rushing the poor man in "How can she slap". In that case, I have nothing to say to you. But I am no coward. Sir.
People that think that violence is a solution to any problem that you face (and violence against somebody half your size at that) are what's wrong with the society today. If a 10 year old looks at you funny to you feel the need to beat them up to prove your "alpha" status?
You obviously don't detest violence against women since you advocate it in your posts. Believing that men twice the size of women should beat women is cowardice, and doesn't teach the girl anything accept that some men are weak and can't handle it when she acts out, and have to resort to physical violence. He didn't have to give an inch. He could have humiliated her with his words and wit if he had it. If not he could have done that he could have restrained her without hitting her.
I get that your being sarcastic But... It isn't about bravery at all since I wasn't there. If you think it's more brave to hit a little teeny bopper half your size then that reflects on you.
If a ten year old persistently jabs at my family jewels with the air of arrogant invulnerability, I'd have no problem giving that little twat a push.
"Resort to physical violence." Resort? Can I ask who resorted to physical violence first? Restrain her? So that she can keep swinging at your vulnerable area? I also like your theory that every man who ever punished a b**** physically is a coward. A b****, not a woman. A b****. A b****. The female equivalent of a douchebag. For all the ways that it could have gone done, I glad that it did the way it did.
2 lessons were learned here. 1. The guy learned after seeing the video that probably wasn't the best way to handle the situation. 2. The girl learned that if she messes with the wrong person and gets physical, it's very possible she'll get KTFO. Both people are probably better off because of this incident.
How many times should he allow her to kick him in the testicles and punch him in the face? If a small male was doing the same thing should he ignore that as well? I'm sure he didn't mean to knock her through the window, but at some point he should be allowed to defend himself.
How cowardly. That child doesn't know any better. You should sit that child down around a campfire and talk with him, having a meaningful discussion about why violence is wrong. Then you can go out for ice cream and everyone would be happy and smiling and perfect. That's how the world works.
Unless the male using violence against the woman was in law enforcement and it was needed to save lives then every man who did use physical violence against a woman half his size is a coward. If the big guy restrained her, then she wouldn't be able to keep swinging at his family jewels. She would have been restrained. If he backed away from her she wouldn't be able to attack him. She was a female... if you want to call her names, then I don't care, and it doesn't bother me, but the fact that she's wrong and an idiot doesn't mean it's okay to use physical violence against her. Yes the woman resorted to violence first. So? If he can't handle a female half his size throwing some lame punches and kicks, maybe he should stay home.
If a small male was doing it, he'd be the bigger, braver man to not fight someone when he had such an obvious advantage. But I wouldn't call him a coward, just that he missed the chance for greater honor. The little teeny bopper wasn't going to seriously injure him no matter what she did. He didn't have to defend himself, just move in, and then get her in a bear hug, or hold her arms. Or maybe just move away from her. Or humiliate her and laugh at her puny attempts to hurt him, and embarrass her. It's just funny to me that people say they are against violence against women, until it happens and they cheer for it.
Substitute she with a just as small he and does your opinion change? Like is it ok for chris paul to nut punch guys because hes small?
Yes, your right that the child should be punched into a sheet of glass. That's how children learn best.
Trust me, 99% of men today would've done that. Why isn't he allowed to stand his ground? "Physical violence against a woman half his size". You keep reiterating this point. What if it's the exact situation, but with a man the same height as the b**** (yes I'm going to keep using that term, not because it's insulting, but fitting.), or ever shorter than her. She's the bigger one, the bully, as stated by her actions. I doubt you'd be making such a fuss. BUT GUESS WHAT, a MAN IS MAN no matter his size. A person is a person no matter what the gender. A guy getting knocked out by an ape through provoking it is the same as a woman. The guy retaliated in the only way he knew how. Does he need more education? yes. DOES SHE? Hell yeah.
