1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. LIVE WATCH EVENT
    The NBA Draft is here! Come join Clutch in the ClutchFans Room Wednesday night at 6:30pm CT as we host the live online NBA Draft Watch Party. Who will the Rockets select at #3?

    NBA Draft - LIVE!

A "Case" for Starting CASE KEENUM

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Antec, Sep 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Antec

    Antec Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    99
    Take a second to think about it guys/gals. I am being completely serious. Technically we could be 0-4 right now. If we were 0-4 wouldn't you want to start Case Keenum? Do the comback wins in SD and TENN really make you a believer of Schaub?

    What do we have to lose?

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. GanjaRocket

    GanjaRocket Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    106
    he wont fall into fetal position at least
     
  3. Richie_Rich

    Richie_Rich Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,360
    Likes Received:
    1,543
    Or you could have just bumped any of your other **** threads. :rolleyes:
     
  4. Antec

    Antec Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    99
    That thread started off too "troll-ish". I am actually trying to make a point here.

    If we didnt have comback wins in SD and TENN. This team would be sitting on 0-4 right now. If this team was 0-3 (going into this week) dont you think there would have been more consideration to start Yates or Keenum?

    And now especially after this loss, the pick 6 (AGAIN). Isnt it time to look at our other options. Especially with SF coming in next week.
     
  5. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    927


    Couldn't every team "technically" be 0-4? Technically that is.





    Technically.
     
    #5 Brando2101, Sep 29, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2013
  6. Antec

    Antec Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    99
    They way they have played the past 4 weeks. They deserve to be 0-4.
     
  7. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    927

    I don't think you get it dude. If you are going to keep ramming the same point down everyones' throats then learn what words mean.
     
  8. mrm32

    mrm32 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    10,457
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    Technically, Matt Schaub could have thrown an 80 yard TD pas in overtime today.
     
  9. Brando2101

    Brando2101 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    927

    Only technically speaking that is.
     
  10. Rock It

    Rock It Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    2
    Matt Schaub gives us the best chance to lose ! Can't go wrong he's thrown 3 picks 6's on the season and 6 interceptions.
     
  11. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,787
    Likes Received:
    3,500
    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/H6sA-pWv9sc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  12. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,267
    If we cut Schaub, just think, we could use that money to get a couple great O-linemen and a CB to take McCain's place. NOW WE TALKIN
     
  13. mrm32

    mrm32 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    10,457
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    Not until the end of next season no? Won't his guaranteed money still hurt us from doing anything significant as far as signings go?
     
  14. Mr.Scarface

    Mr.Scarface Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    12,332
    Likes Received:
    7,552
    you do realize TJ Yates is #2? Keenum didn't beat him out. Tank for Manziel!:eek:
     
  15. Antec

    Antec Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    99
    It was bc Kubiak didn't want to embarrass TJ.

    We all watched the preseason, Keenum is just as good as TJ, if not better.
     
  16. speedball

    speedball Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    31
    Technically, the Jackets worked and we won the super bowl last year. why's everyone upset?
     
  17. rezdawg

    rezdawg Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2000
    Messages:
    18,351
    Likes Received:
    1,148
    Too bad Yates gets the nod if Schaub is benched.

    Next year, you can start these antics again.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now