What error? Zimmerman wasn't charged initially because there was thought NOT TO BE a valid case against him--- TURNED OUT TO BE TRUE.
Let me guess......white female victim and 3 "big black brutes" right? So how long until they are lynched?
"Black on Black" crime huh? If you don't see how that notion is itself a racist one.....then you are an idiot.
Again people were not up in arms about the incident but rather the amount of time that passed before Zimmerman was put on trial.
Honestly, I don't think I've read one remark (until yours) in this thread which pertains to what you are observing. Perhaps you meant the time-lapse before charges were drawn against Zimmerman? Most of the posts here, some of which included Tweets, are about a gun-toting white man killing an innocent black child. On the face, that is a true statement but the reality is far, far more complex.
Zimmerman wasn't charged initially without due diligence which turned out to be true. After the due diligence he was found to be not guilty, that's another argument. The initial outrage wasn't at the not guilty verdict (though now that it's becoming a major story those started popping up) but that no one even went through the motions of at least making sure what he said was true and a do a trial.
Weird, as soon as I saw this thread was making giddyup look bad I thought expect some sort of prayers thread in the hang out. Giddyup you never disappoint.
Okay Would you like to know the number for "black on white" crimes? I'm sure it will support whatever point you're trying to make
Huh? What then was the investigation on the scene and the initial five hours of questioning? That was just the start...
Thanks for the advertisement, bro! I assume you included it because it's your place, not simply because you don't read what you post before you post it (because that would just be silly). Is there a ClutchFans discount, perchance?
Because I doubt that Chris Serino alone would not have been allowed to make the decision not to charge Zimmerman with a crime. Certainly he would have had to have a superior(s) sign off on that. You allude to racism with the department but the pertinent story that comes out is that members of that same department were pressuring Serino to charge Zimmerman... and those members were friends of Trayvon's father.
Either this is clever product placement or an out and out lie... or BOTH... but I didn't author this post.
This is life in the D&D. I was absolutely right about the Trayvon Martin case (GZ found innocent) and I was absolutely right about the Jacqueline Gardner case (not a peep about her tragic death-- not to mention the hundreds of others like her until I bring it forth) and you strive to say that I am made to "look bad." This is a hilarious place.
Notice there aren't any posters offering excuses for the killers of an innocent person and hoping they avoid punishment like giddy and his ilk did. You know, if you want to be a complete idiot and compare the two situations.
There was no evidence that Jacqueline Gardner attacked those three, strapping young men, Einstein. The comparison is really a contrast. Poor Jacqueline Gardner is no news here while Trayvon Martin generates an epic thread.
I'm not defending the killers here, Copernicus. That's always your job. Well, if the victim is black.
You mean the man who was found not guilty? That racist giddyup, defending an innocent man when a black person died!
Thank you for stating the obvious. I'm sorry you had to even bother. RM95 just has a grudge against me and snipes like this constantly...
I don't see my conspiracy theory. Where is it? It's a fact that the Sanford police department has a questionable history with respect to race. Do your research. I know you want to change the subject anytime you've been proven wrong but no.
