1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Trayvon Martin

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Mar 10, 2012.

  1. ktbballplaya

    ktbballplaya Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,750
    Likes Received:
    278
    Injuries suggested that he was losing the fight and witnesses that DIDNT see who threw the FIRST punch. How do we know that GZ didnt have his hand on his waistband while approaching TM? We dont, but said we did then I'm in fear of my life at the point and will fight back.
     
  2. what

    what Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    14,618
    Likes Received:
    2,584
    No matter what you say, Trayvon Martin is dead as a result of a neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman, and you (not actually you, but you in the general sense) aren't going to convince anybody but gun-toting, trigger happy, white conservatives, that THIS HAD TO HAPPEN.

    Gun-totters who feel every moment of every day that their rights are being shrunk by the liberal left.
     
  3. NewRoxFan

    NewRoxFan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2002
    Messages:
    55,794
    Likes Received:
    55,868
    Sorry, but when I was trained as "community WATCH" we were trained to NOT follow nor confront people we thought suspicious. We were also trained to NOT carry a weapon. We were trained to call the police (the people trained and responsible for pursuing, confronting and apprehending suspects of crimes). That's why the dispatcher told Zimmerman he didn't need to follow Martin.

    This was also true in Sanford.

    Zimmerman was a wannabe cop with pocketful of courage. He could have called the cops and stayed in his car. He didn't, unfortunately.
     
  4. mr. 13 in 33

    mr. 13 in 33 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    10,617
    Likes Received:
    636
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Wow!!! Stunned!!! Saddened as a father!!! Some1 make sense of this verdict for me right now please!!! Don't worry I'll wait...</p>&mdash; THREE (@DwyaneWade) <a href="https://twitter.com/DwyaneWade/statuses/356233921287036928">July 14, 2013</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  5. Granville

    Granville Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    926
    Did you even listen to the 911 tapes or watch any of the trial? Only 1 scream???

    You are making an ass of youself!
     
  6. SkyrimOwnsAll

    SkyrimOwnsAll Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    42

    a riots a riot
     
  7. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Doesn't the law say that if someone has a legitimate reason to feel his personal safety is physically threatened, then he may attack in self-defense. So then the question is whether Zimmerman was merely following/questioning, or doing something more threatening (e.g. pointing his gun at him as he's following).
     
  8. panamamyers

    panamamyers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2000
    Messages:
    1,627
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    If you attack someone else, then you better be damn sure he doesn't have a gun on him.
    That's why it is always best to just flee and avoid confrontations.
    Trying to keep it too real and you end up running into someone that has a gun,and if you initiated the physical confrontation then you don't have anyone to blame but yourself.
     
  9. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    Neil DeGrasse Tyson ‏
    'Unlike Florida today, only if threatened by another Gun did "Wild West" codes of conduct allow you to shoot another person.'
     
  10. Codman

    Codman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    11,954
    The only sense one can gain from the verdict is a loophole in the system or a lack of common sense by the jury.

    It's not being "intellectually lazy" if you disagree with the case and firmly believe that TM was profiled for being black and "up to no good." If you follow the case, read the evidence, and disagree with a faulty verdict, you aren't lazy, as LittleManSyndrome_Texxx tries to imply.

    Either way, GZ is lucky to not be in jail for manslaughter. Yet, his brother is all over the media glorifying his brother's actions. Hooray for being found not guilty of killing a teenager. Good for you GZ. I hope you're proud of taking another one of those "A**holes" you spoke of off of your streets. Next time, let the qualified officers investigate who the next black kid in your neighborhood really is. That would be nice, for a change.

    And I'm not the only one that believes this case is related to racial profiling. I am not on the fringe in that respect. Even the evidence suggests that the assumptions were largely based on race. Just as an FYI, I come from a black father and a white mother, so it's not like I have an agenda when I follow this case.

    We live in a sickening world. Those that defend GZ without really recognizing that a teenager died are part of the problem. You can believe that GZ acted in self-defense, but this thread shows how there are so many without ANY remorse for the VICTIM. Someone died, yet GZ defenders don't acknowledge that. They see GZ as a hero for instigating something that he had no business being part of in the first place.

    It's like a real life version of Paul Blart:Mall Cop. Trayvon's legacy won't go to waste though.

    This is another unfortunate wakeup call that profiling and a great divide between moral and immoral behavior still exists in our great America.

    RIP Trayvon.
     
  11. alexcapone

    alexcapone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,349
    Likes Received:
    543
    I believe you are referring to "a reasonable fear of death or grave bodily harm." I don't think there is legal prescedent that backs up the hypothetical scenario that you are suggesting (following) but I'm not an expert so please post if there is. The pointing the gun scenario would qualify but that is complete conjecture on your part as it relates to this case.
     
  12. LosPollosHermanos

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,041
    Likes Received:
    14,095
    Our nation has a history of this stuff.


    One of the most brutal murderers to date (Emmet Till) was free and walking about and later even admitted to murdering him.

    GZ might have been better off in jail, because he is going to see a lot of vigilante justice come his way...
     
  13. Granville

    Granville Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,555
    Likes Received:
    926
    You do know that by these things that are important and don't know provide reasonable doubt that helps the defense.
     
  14. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    My point is simply that without knowing what were the circumstances that led an unarmed kid to attack an armed man who was allegedly following him, I can't assume the kid was an aggressor who had it (being shot at) coming. Note that I did not say Martin acted out of self-defense, just that he might have for all we know.
     
  15. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,105
    Likes Received:
    3,756
    agreed, "qualified officers" hardly ever investigate random black people walking down a street and certainly never shoot them. To death. And then walk free. Amirite?
     
  16. LosPollosHermanos

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,041
    Likes Received:
    14,095
    LOL @ Jury



    The women who sat through the nearly month-long trial ranged in age from womenin their early 30s to women in their 60s. Four of the women either have experience with guns or relatives who are gun owners. Two of them share a passion for rescuing animals. Five of them are white and the sixth is a minority, believed to be Hispanic. Five of them were mothers.
     
  17. The Real Shady

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2000
    Messages:
    17,173
    Likes Received:
    3,972
    Sounds like the defense did an amazing job at jury selection.
     
  18. LosPollosHermanos

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    30,041
    Likes Received:
    14,095
    I chuckled a bit

    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Iw-pvCREZTY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page