Hibbert is cheaper, Kobe is a bigger talent. It's hard to build a team around Kobe, and it's hard to build it around Hibbert in this draft, unless he's your 3rd best player. In the end, Oscar/Kobe/Josh Smith/Vucevic is a more talented core than Oscar/Brad Beal/Smith/Hibbert (+ a better bench). As for what I do with Hibbert, frankly, that's my problem. To be fair, I took Kobe in large part because I didn't want someone else to grab him and build a superteam either by keeping him or trading him. In the end, it didn't cost me anything because at that point the best three players on my list were Kobe, ZBO and Pekovic -- and I still ended up with Pekovic somehow. So yeah, i might amnesty Hibbert. But I'm definitely not giving him away for essentially nothing and helping someone build a superteam. If someone wants to do a deal that actually helps me somehow, I'm always listening.
i don't know. i guess at least a day, like always. maybe longer. personally, i'm not really looking forward to judging matchups just 4 days after the previous ones. this draft had a crazy pace.
The way you word your words sound beautifully. Now you want a star back in return for HIbbert to make yourself the super team Monroe butler for HIbbert Barnes sound logical Bcuz it gets you under the cap and a starting SF who plays hard D. I need a rim protector. Now your team is so stacked from the Kobe pickup that you aren't even interested in any of my players. Now if you amnesty him you gain nothing. Everyone losses out on him. By not allowing an amnesty'd player to be picked up via amnesty Or It's going to be an all out war to see who types his name first for hibbert
i'd still have to cut him. i can only take like 2 mil in place of Hibbert. that, or it has to be a bigger deal that includes my starters.
