1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

We do NOT need a stretch 4!

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by aaly1130, May 16, 2013.

  1. Type Raba

    Type Raba Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    6
    we dont need a 3 pt shooter, just a solid shooter that can make a 15-20 footer consistently and finish at the rim. both harden and lin would be instantly better with a legit pnr/pnp player. any post play would be extra.
     
  2. Akim523

    Akim523 Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    505
    Uh... With the current play style, we do. It would be a different story if we could get Dwight
     
  3. TJ VS TR

    TJ VS TR Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    37
    We have T-Jones and D-Mo. They are stretch fours. We don't need to sign an expensive one. Stretch fours open up the lane, it's good. If those two were better and played against the Thunder we had a chance.
     
  4. chenjy9

    chenjy9 Numbers Don't Lie
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,534
    Likes Received:
    10,532
    I honestly don't think we need a stretch 4, at least not one that consistently extends to the 3pt range. Just having a 4 who can knock down and pass from the elbow would be more than enough to open up space. Our bigger problem is the lack of offensive production coming from our bigs. If either 4 or 5 can consistently catch and score, that alone will create spacing as defenders will be less willing to stray from the big man they are guarding to collapse on positions 1-3. All our scoring comes from PG, SG, and SF basically.
     
  5. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,748
    Likes Received:
    35,390
    Nice post a1130, but I think a stretch 4 only adds to the amount of space our center can work with. Also, 28% from 3 isn't the end of the world. That's like shooting 42 percent FG%. Charles Barkley is in the hall of fame and he shot 26.6% from 3pt range. The 3pt opens up driving lanes.
     
  6. chenjy9

    chenjy9 Numbers Don't Lie
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,534
    Likes Received:
    10,532
    Barkley also had gravity defying ups. :grin:
     
  7. dobro1229

    dobro1229 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    25,730
    Likes Received:
    22,494
    Ideally you would like your 4 man or your 5 man to be able to operate in the high post at the very least. There are lots of ways a coach can manufacture space in an offensive set.

    Just look at the triangle offense, and the princeton sets as an example of what you can do with two bigs.

    However, what you do not want is a cluttered paint area with little to no movement. Its just that there are more ways than 1 to create space than just having a stretch 4. There are more ways than one way to skin a cat.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,748
    Likes Received:
    35,390
    Now he just harps on the Rockets and defies the wordings on "all you can eat" restaurants. :D
     
  9. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,748
    Likes Received:
    35,390
    I have been reading clutchfans for over a decade and have never seen anyone use the skin a cat phrase. This moment calls for rep.
     
  10. thejav

    thejav Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,169
    Likes Received:
    488
  11. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,940
    Likes Received:
    132,982
    If you want to limit ISO's and long offensive dry spells, you need a stretch 4 or 5. It isn't just about having another 3 point shooter on the floor, it is about opening up the lane for two of the best 10-20 penetrators in the NBA (Harden/Lin).

    The Rockets offense would be DEADLY with a 5 that can finish off the P&R and a 4 that is a true stretch 4.

    A back to the basket, classic power forward will severely limit the guard play and coupled with Asik's stone hands, you will see the offense come to a stand still.
     
  12. chenjy9

    chenjy9 Numbers Don't Lie
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,534
    Likes Received:
    10,532
    Well... what goes up will always eventually come down right? His weight got too much for his gravity defying ups and started generating its own significant gravitational pull... to food and the floor. ZING!
     
  13. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,940
    Likes Received:
    132,982
    A couple of points..... the farther from the paint the shooter is, the less time defenders have to quickly adjust to penetration. That is why ideally you want someone with legitimate 3 point range. The other issue is that the Rockets do not value 15 foot shots, they would rather 3's from a value stand point.

    A 4 and/or 5 that can finish inside obviously is a huge help, but it is not enough.
     
  14. Texanswin2013

    Texanswin2013 Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    13
  15. Naija Texan

    Naija Texan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    55
    I agree a stretch 4 isn't likely to be as useful to us as a well rounded Power Forward.

    Someone that can score in the post or take a decent shot away from it is better then a Forward that wants to be a perimeter player and probably doesn't have the talent for it outside a 30% jumper and not trying for rebounds.
     
  16. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,940
    Likes Received:
    132,982
    We are not talking about starting Steve Novak at the 4. There is no reason they cannot be a suitable rebounder and hold their own inside.
     
  17. chenjy9

    chenjy9 Numbers Don't Lie
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,534
    Likes Received:
    10,532
    I still consider an elbow 4 who can pass will be much better for us if we get Howard than keeping Asik intentionally and looking for a stretch 4. TBH, we already have so many spacers. We can use Parsons IMO as a stretch 4 if needed. An elbow 4 would still keep spacing while allowing us to initiate PnR or offense from the elbow position. That said, if we don't get Howard, I wouldn't mind a stretch 4 since we would be keeping the same offense.
     
  18. parksn306

    parksn306 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes Received:
    40
    I agree with OP, but I'll go even further. We don't even need a post player.

    Literally all we need is a guy that can grab rebounds and patrol the paint, without fouling everything that moves. Think about what a season Asik had, all without a reliable 4. If he gets just a little help from the 4...
     
  19. Hui

    Hui Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    113
    I agree as well. If we could get Love and Dwight Howard that would be ideal!
     
  20. seahawk

    seahawk Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    17
    Has any twin towers that was working before? Just curious.
     

Share This Page