Texas A&M Student Senate Passes Discriminatory LGBT Bill

I love the D&D.

 

Ah. I wasn't going to continue to reply to your posts full of excrement, but that you hope that FB will "move on," not doubt due to you not having an argument in reply to his posts worth writing on a sheet of toilet paper, has caused me to reconsider. The more you post, the more convinced I become that this entire effort on your part is rooted in bigotry and an insecurity in your own sexuality. I've known people like you before in "real life." Sadly, people like you are not that uncommon. Instead of using crap biblical "science" to "defend" what is really indivisible, you might consider reexamining what is behind what you are saying. You slander the LGBT community without basis, while claiming to have a host of members of the LGBT community as your "understanding" friends. I don't buy it. You should be ashamed of yourself. You should be ashamed, you hypocrite.

Someone said, "know thyself." That's what you should work on, not slandering a significant percentage of the American population because of their lifestyle, which your bigotry is eager to deny the rights as Americans and human beings that they deserve like anyone else in this country, all because of your inner fears about your own sexuality. In my humble opinion. Now I'm going to go wash my hands. Simply typing a post directed at you makes them feel dirty.

 

From the natural order of male and female it is evident that the two become one unit.

Homosexual acts deny the natural order to male and female sexual relationship that is bound in the holy right of marriage.

I am not opposed to civil unions, if that is what the people want. I will not support it personally but will live just fine with it.

Marriage is a religious covenant and should be treated as such.

The school I'm sure will handle this situation as best as they can. I am not against a LGBT resource center, but I do think it is a novel idea to allow students the opportunity to decide where their fees can go. In fact, I wish they had a greater freedom to that.

 

Um, no you obviously don't. You're attributing a negative morality based on nothing but the bible. Please show me the science and evidence that makes homosexuality immoral.

 

You can choose to commit heterosexual acts and by your logic hat a lifestyle choice. What is the evidentiary or scientific basis for objecting to their actions?

 

Homosexuality doesn't deny anything to males and female sexuality. Both can and do exist in nature. They happen naturally in many different species.

 

Having sex with women after you're married is best for the continuance of our species. Killing off the mentally disabled is also best. Aborting children with diseases is too. Is that your new thing? All hail the continuance of our species because that doesn't really jive with the religious stuff.

That is not what science says. Why are so many religious people so damn ignorant about science?

 

Your entire religious belief system is based on fallacy. Your posts are incredibly ironic.

 

Yes, if it was a matter of merely continuing the species men would have sex with as many women as possible as much as possible yet I don't think that's what bobmarley is advocating.

 

Uh...

 

Please explain how my comments are rooted in bigotry and insecurity in my own sexuality besides your own personal experience, because we both know how personal experience can lie to us.

I am sorry you have had bad experiences with individuals who are unable to hold to certain beliefs without making improper comments or slanderous accusations.

Please let me know how I have slandered to LGBT community and I will apologize. Also, please let me know how I am a hypocrite as well. Unfortunately, it sounds like most of the slanderous speech is actually coming from you.

What rights am I denying to anyone?

The problem, it really seems, is that you have deep seated emotional issues with this cause and are unable to appropriately communicate your viewpoint without making baseless claims and libelous accusations.

I really think you should sit this one out. I don't think you can handle this right now.

 

Your definition of natural seems to be off. What, again, does the fact that two men cannot procreate together have anything to do with this discussion? It's a BS point you keep repeating.

By your definition, oral sex is not natural. No babies come from oral sex, after all. See how ridiculous your point sounds?

 

And I cannot create a baby by masturbating. I guess I am committing unnatural acts multiple times per week...

 

I know you're just frustrated but that's the easiest question to answer. Confirmation Bias and indoctrination + lack of education.

 

Many men and women commit heterosexual acts without the ability to procreate. They are now immoral by your definition.

 

Ok, your argument seems to be that it is ok to want support and companionship of people that you are attracted to as long as you don't ever give in to the desire for physical intimacy. Correct?

How would you feel if someone tried to say you are immoral for having sex with a person you are attracted to? You would not like it much I'm sure.

Now imagine that you are also at risk to be beaten or even killed for just wanting what everyone else wants....the ability to live your life the way you want to.

Forget the bull**** moral objections...they are fine for using to decide how YOU are going to live your life, but you have ZERO place using them to deny another person what you cherish.

and since you repeated this point over and over....who gives a crap if a small minority of the population won't be reproducing, the Earth is already having trouble supporting the sheer volume of people that are on it now. Our birthrate could stand a reduction.

 

yes, i too would like to know if bobmarley has ever had sex for non-procreative purposes.

 

So what does that mean exactly? Its not passing and is that real?